LOUD NOISES!!!

Because he's an OUTSIDER who's going to BRING DOWN THE ESTABLISHMENT and then he'll CHANGE AMERICA via such methods as GETTING RID OF FOOD INSPECTION.

Also in his newsletter he used to offer HELPFUL TIPS on how to SHOOT A BLACK PERSON AND GET AWAY WITH IT. NOT JOKING.

20 years of listening to Rush Limbaugh tell them that there are absolutely no options outside of the Republican party combined with a creeping realization that their own collective arrogance, sloth and greed leading to a swift and rapid decline within their own lifetimes had led a vast number of them to retreat into a fantasyland wherein they can not only have their Republican messiah but also restore public services they're going to need very quickly whilst simultaneously continuing to decry infrastructure spending and necessary tax increases.

Oh, and black man is scary.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fs0Jji27OX8

cognitivedissonance: king of the run-on sentence.

Five for IN YOUR FACE!!

Specifically, I don't think that many people who support Ron Paul have seriously examined his claims or his past associations. They latch on to a phrase like, 'go back to the gold standard', without realizing what a crazy, stupid idea that is. They want zero entitlements without realizing that entitlements are to some degree necessary and humane. They observe a calcification in national politics and jump at an alternative that seems good but in actual practice would be a disaster. They've jumped at product C because they're mad at product A and can't bear to be associated with product B. Also, they're buttholes.

I'm proud to be the king of the run-on sentence.

This guy's been doing his trying-too-hard-methed-up-angry-guy bit for years. What's amazing is that the routine hasn't changed in the slightest. He has dozens of videos and they're all pretty interchangeable. He's the Daniel Songer of Youtube politics.

YOU SOUND LIKE A PAWN OF THE MEDIA!

I'm curious if they hold other politicians to account for the speeches they give (not really, since they do, like everyone else) even though most of the time the speaker didn't write a single word of it.

I worked with a guy who was a trendy tea party activist but also a blubbering manbaby. I brought up the Palin interview good and he spun it saying it was at fault of her speech writers and she was unprepared to do an interview about something as simple as her personal opinions and ideals. So no, they blame other people who work for them. Politicians aren't paid to think, they are apparently paid to just follow orders.

It's a stupid-as-fuck defense to protect those politicians from being held accountable for their bad mistakes.

the guy in the video has a history of being dead wrong and screaming about how he just knows he's right. He's been doing it for years.