Spit Spingola - 2012-02-09
Multi-part submission wouldn't work.
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7xVGy2rc_k
Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1D8bXCR6Epk
Part 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDKT-SLtq4c
|
chairsforcheap  - 2012-02-09
omg thank you for this.
|
cognitivedissonance - 2012-02-09
When I was in 10th grade, we had to do presentations on various elements from the Periodic Table.
I did a miniature remake of The Shining, and had to explain good ol' Au. I'd KILL for that tape right now and I don't know what happened to it.
|
freedoom - 2012-02-09
well that successfully got me through 45 minutes of my last hour at work and i learned a few things too!
|
exy - 2012-02-09
Planned to drop out after getting a feel for it 5 minutes in, had to watch the whole thing straight through.
|
Paracelsus - 2012-02-09
Truly, an interesting beard grown mangy from lack of Occam's Razor. Interesting though.
|
badideasinaction - 2012-02-09
And after reading
http://www.collativelearning.com/the%20shining.html
I thought it was all about little Jack planning the murder of his father over sexual abuse.
and after reading http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/luna/luna_apollomissions10.htm and other spots it was about him faking the moon landings.
Man, Kubrick works on so many levels...
|
badideasinaction - 2012-02-09 Actually, never mind, that first analysis is from the same guy... weird.
|
That guy - 2012-02-11 Same guy, huh?
I guess he found a better cockamamie theory for his non-accredited dissertation.
Thanks for those links though.
And I'm painfully entertained by the idea that all of a great filmmaker's continuity errors are moments of transcendent genius with a secret message.
|
poorwill - 2012-02-10
So ... is this insane or not? Because I honestly can't tell. I'm not a goldbug but I think much of the criticism of the fed is valid even if the conclusions are questionable. I have NO IDEA if the dot-connecting about the movie is well-founded or not.
|
|
THA SUGAH RAIN - 2012-02-10 Who gives a fuck? Stan wasn't some prophet sent from the sky. He's just a film director. He didn't possess some secret divine code left for future generations to crack.
|
Paracelsus - 2012-02-10 Will, it makes no sense at all. It's a tenuous, extremely defensive set of arguments with paper-thin justification.
|
chumbucket - 2012-02-10
This is what happens when directors don't include commentary on the DVD.
|
| Register or login To Post a Comment |
Reddit
Digg
Stumble
Facebook