The Mothership  - 2012-09-25
Sold.
|
Hooker - 2012-09-25
I love watching bad movies. I watch far more bad movies than I do good and"good" movies combined. Having watched as many as I have, I've come to think that the biggest distinction between an enjoyable movie and an unenjoyable one is the scope it sets for itself. Ed Wood's movies, for instance, used cardboard sets and cheezey special effects to tell a story that involved the entire world. An Asylum film, meanwhile, will usually tell a story about robots from outer space and will take place almost entirely in back alleys and deciduous forests. The Ed Wood films have the a sincere desire to tell a massive story and stumbles with resources and talent. The Asylum films know they are going to stumble with resources and talent and slash the effort they are willing to put in by slashing the scope of the production.
This movie seems to take place entirely in building, judging by this trailer.
|
Hooker - 2012-09-25 One building, even.
|
Kabbage - 2012-09-25 I dunno, this is usually true. But my favorite movies tend to be vaguely wide-scope road-trip style films, but tightly focused on the main cast. 28 Days Later and Children of Men move around a lot, across cities, though the story never strays from the main character. In fact, I'm pretty neither of those ever leave the main character.
I guess that's "smaller scope" too, though.
|
Hooker - 2012-09-25 Scope doesn't necessarially mean physical scope. No Exit is a terrific play that takes place in one room for three people, but the implications of it involve the rest of the people's lives. This doesn't seem like a personal movie, though.
|
Corpus Delectable - 2012-09-25 That one room is the redecorated restaurant where kiddo defeated the Crazy 88.
Tarantino is "omaging" himself, now.
|
Robin Kestrel - 2012-09-26 It is, isn't it? The whole time I was thinking to myself that this looks a lot like that scene from Kill Bill. It's the same damn set.
|
Kabbage - 2012-09-25
This looks like, Virtual Weapon-caliber entertaining.
|
Chocolate Jesus - 2012-09-25
What a bunraku.
|
kingarthur - 2012-09-25
Made my to do list.
|
Billy the Poet - 2012-09-25
There's no way this can possibly be as good as I want it to be.
|
Riskbreaker - 2012-09-25
I would like this better if it didn't had Lucy Liu, she's a bore to watch. Russell Crow looks surprisingly fun in this.
|
WHO WANTS DESSERT - 2012-09-26
Last time a musician and a bunch of actors I like made a kung-fu movie together it wound up being Bunraku :(
|
SolRo - 2012-09-26
Tarantino and CGI? This is going to be terrible.
Did all of his best movies without one bit of CGI, even the not so great ones are more charming and enjoyable because you can see the effort taken to make the setting, characters and action real and believable.
This just looks like shit.
|
Adham Nu'man - 2012-09-26 The movie is neither Directed nor written by Tarantino. The "Quentin Tarantino Presents" label at the beginning is simply the equivalent of Tarantino saying "HAI GUISE, CHECK OUT WHAT A FEW OF MY FREINDS MADE"
|
TeenerTot - 2012-09-26
I fart on this.
But out of respect for Tarantino fans, I will not one-star.
Honor.
|
Rudy - 2012-09-26
Knives Shoot Out Everywhere: The Movie
|
NancyDrewFan123 - 2012-09-26
You had me at "The RZA"
|
memedumpster - 2012-09-26
This looks terrible... and I sincerely don't want it to be. I want to go see it anyway in hopes that it surprises me.
|
Rodents of Unusual Size - 2012-09-27
I actually love watching movies that are this historically inaccurate. Spotting the anachronisms makes for a great game.
|
dairyqueenlatifah - 2012-09-27
This would have cleaned up at the box office had it been released 12 years ago.
|
| Register or login To Post a Comment |
Reddit
Digg
Stumble
Facebook