| poeTV | Submit | Login   |

Reddit Digg Stumble Facebook

Help keep poeTV running


And please consider not blocking ads here. They help pay for the server. Pennies at a time. Literally.

Comment count is 33
EnochEmery - 2015-04-01

Going Transcendental: coming soon to HBO.


Old_Zircon - 2015-04-01

I used to know someone who went to college with Lynch did, and was good friends with his roommate. Everyone thought he was weird because he didn't take drugs and mostly kept to himself.


Old_Zircon - 2015-04-01

Howard Stern is (was?) in to this stuff, too.


Old_Zircon - 2015-04-01

They got themselves a senator, too:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_ofVGwlerY


Old_Zircon - 2015-04-01

And a CNN anchor:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sUv2kQjyXI


kingarthur - 2015-04-01

And unfortunately Santigold from what I have heard and as much as I am in love with that woman, this kind of shit is a deal breaker.


infinite zest - 2015-04-01

I always get Maharishi and Rajneeshee confused. Now the latter, THAT's how you run a cult.


Old_Zircon - 2015-04-01

I'm a Baghavan Das man, myself, mostly because his second album is great and I like the artwork his commune did for Richard Alpert.

As far as running a cult with style, though, Hansadutta wins. Nothing beats machine gun toting Hare Krishnas in hoodies and dark glasses. Also his first album was pretty great; I've never tracked down the allegedly metal-influenced one he did in the 80s after he got out of jail, though.


That guy - 2015-04-01

Maybe I met one of Hansadutta's guys once?
He was dressed up like a Hare K, and knew the speak, but was using it to try to forcefully pick up on girls and threatening anyone who told him to knock it off at a kooky cafe that served yuppies and hobos in Santa Monica.

Southern California is amazing.


Old_Zircon - 2015-04-01

I don't know a ton about him, most of my info comes from a smear campaign that was launched by rival Krishan leaders and one record collector who used to be in contact with him. MY understanding is that in the 70s, when the founder ofn the US Krishnas died, something like a dozen people all claimed to be his rightful successor and set up their own rival temples. Hansadutta (who, coincidentally, was a German immigrant with a thick accent and penchant for recording weird psychedelic folk, just like Baghavan Das, hence me knowing about him) started the San Francisco one. They all wore hoodies and their slogan was "Guru Means Heavy" (there were apparently posters of him looking like the Unabomber sketch with that slogan below all over the temple - you can kind of see it on the first LP cover, even without the glasses). When he went to jail for a year or two for firing a machine gun at a liquor store out of a moving car, he was ousted from the Krishnas and ended up running a trailer park somewhere in southern California (I forget where) for most of the 80s and 90s. When I knew the guy who had been corresponding with him, though, he had recently gotten back the publishing rights to all of his books from the Krishna days and was no longer answering mail.

Which sucks for me, because I know for a fact that he had quite a few unsold copies of the metal LP and was selling them for a pop by mail to people who wrote and asked, before he decided he was a guru again. No idea what happened after that, unfortunately the collector I knew died not long after of health complications related to doing every kind of drug the is from the 70s until I don't know when, but at least the mid 90s.

I always wonder if he had any kind of connection to the early development of the Krishnacore scene, especially since he would have been down near LA round about when X was probably first getting in to it. I never really hear about that though, it seems like it was mainly an NYC thing, at least in the US.


chumbucket - 2015-04-01

I love David Lynch and his films but god: "money for peace-creating groups"?? Huge spit-take on that one.


Old_Zircon - 2015-04-01

I haven't been to impressed by anything post Twin Peaks I've seen from him, except for The Straight Story.


Old_Zircon - 2015-04-01

Actually, I had to double check when he got in to TM, turns out it was 1973. I kind of assumed it coincided with his work declining, kind of like when the Incredible String Band became scientologists.


That guy - 2015-04-01

Now that I've seen this, my take on him and his movies goes like this:
-glad he makes stuff
-The Straight Story is a hidden masterpiece. I'm full of recommends for that.
-He's kinda like a French New Wave filmmaker, in that the filmmaking moves that he invents are more important than the works as a whole.
-I think for most of his movies, he pulls pranks on his audience but has a mental filter, partly built out of transcendental meditation schtick, that doesn't let him fully realize that that's what he's doing
-this somehow turns into fan/critic praise for psychoanalytic/expressionist/symbolic works of genius
-Lynch's brain rolls on the floor with laughter
-Public Lynch is the straight man in the double act between him and his brain.
-When he does something that's lower stakes to him, like appearing on Louie, he gets to just mess around and he's funny as fuck.


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2015-04-01

I like Lynch when he manages a lucid narrative (meaning I can understand it)

Thumbs up Wild at Heart
Blue Velvet
Twin Peaks

Thumbs down Lost Highway
Mullhholland Drive
Eraserhead

Also hated Fire Walk With Me, The Twin Peaks Movie. Sheryl Lee, Dana Ashbrook, etc, had become too old to be playing high school students, and seeing them on the big screen only made it harder to overlook, but even worse, it was another unnecessary prequel like Star Wars 1-3, a pointless, elaborate retelling of what we already knew.

Anybody who loves any of the Lynch Movies that I hate, I don't doubt the validity of your experience. You get it, I don't.


That guy - 2015-04-01

JHM, see The Straight Story.

Masterpiece.


Old_Zircon - 2015-04-01

I liked Eraserhead a lot, but last time I saw it I was 12. I like The Elephant Man a lot, I know that's kind of contentious. I like scenes in Wild At Heart a lot, some parts of it are among the best things he's done. It's kind of a mess taken as a whole, though. I though this Twin Peaks pilot was good and the first season was great. I've never made it through season 2 though, I can get 5 or 6 episodes in usually but that's all I can take.

I literally don't remember a thing about Lost Highway except that there were a lot of shots of the actual highway itself, right? Muldholland drive had one good scene, the dumpster. Somewhere in the mid 90s is when I feel like he started to believe his own hype, but who knows for sure. I would love to find out that the last 20 years of his career were brilliant long-game trolling at the expense of the critics and fandom but I think it's more likely that he got into a Tim Burton style echo chamber situation. I'm sure I've said this all on here before.

For me, Crazy Clown Time is full Poe's Law, though. Everything about it is just so patently phoned in and terrible that it almost has to be a parody of his own style, but somehow I don't think it is.

But, I mean, hey, if I could get money to make a album of music that sounded like watered down Crispin Glover poetry sun in a phony Daniel Johnston voice over Ry Cooder's soundtrack for Last Man Standing (which in itself is kind of biting Morphine but that's another story) I'd definitely do it. It sounds like a lot of fun.


Old_Zircon - 2015-04-01

Straight Story is fantastic, though. Possibly the best thing he's done.


fluffy - 2015-04-01

Mulholland Drive is a bit inscrutable but I love it. Eraserhead is pretty damn straightforward though. I haven't seen Straight Story. Sounds like I should though.

I met David Lynch at a Q&A session once. Someone asked him how he maintains such a steady "lucid dream" feel to all of his movies, and his response was one of pretending to not understand what the person was asking, and eventually just said that he writes what he knows.


chumbucket - 2015-04-02

I'm not sure if it was his latest but I do remember getting all of the way through Inland Empire and wondered why he made that movie.


misterbuns - 2015-04-01

Hm. I have a lot to say about this, you should read it if you are curious about TM.

I took the first TM course about 10 months ago and after giving the organization critical look I can say it is not a cult, though it does make some strange choices that although raises red flags, end up being more puzzling and not predatory. The biggest reason? In the ten months following my course they've never called me or pressured me to give any money. But for those who are curious or unconvinced, here is an comprehensive account of my experience.


Lynch has always been a huge inspiration for me and an important figure in my life, not on a personal level, I've never met him, but I've always admired how he does things. I was always aware of TM because I've followed him since I was young but it was his book Catching The Big Fish that got me interested in TM.

It should be noted that the experience Lynch describes in Catching the Big Fish is not actually the kind of meditation they teach you, but I will get into that later.

After reading his book I began meditating often. Mostly when I wanted to approach a problem from another perspective. Dreams have always been an important part of my creative process and I wanted to be able access that kind of half conscious state whenever I wanted. I essentially just did what Lynch describes in the book (which again, is not actually TM)

I made this film during that time: http://jonathan-sims.squarespace.com/slider/ these were things that lept directly out of my subconscious and I decided to film them. Anyway, I was hooked.

Years later I was gifted a course at the LA TM center ( I did not pay for the course ) and I figured I would take a closer look at this thing even though my meditative process was working fine for me.

Here is an account of my experience at the center. First I will list the things that stuck out to me as red flags and then I will explain how in my experience these things dont amount to the insular, secretive, predatory behavior of a cult and how the benefits of TM (albeit an off brand unofficial version of it) are real to me.

Really, I only noticed two things that concerned me:

1.) Specious medical claims. The benefits of meditation have been the focus of a number of peer reviewed studies and are real so I didnt like or understand why they had to go the "this might cure cancer" route' with their PR. It's a specious and unethical to claim. So this bothered me. Also, recently they sent me a thing about healing gems, which is lol. These kind of claims are uncharacteristic of them, but are definitely made.

2.) Religious Underpinnings. I was ready for this to be a Scientology scenario where the introductory courses are designed to appear secular and hide the structure of a religious world view that I would be asked to accept later. While that wasn't the case for the students it became clear that to the instructors there is spiritual and possibly religious underpinnings for them.

They should be transparent about this, but they aren't and I can't think of a good reason why, because TM truly isn't an evangelical organization. They say the mantras are meaningless sounds important only because of their physical qualities. but the mantras also have Vedic significance and are assigned to the students based on spiritual principles.

There is a ritual the instructors perform when you receive your mantra. And while you aren't asked to participate in it by this point it is clear that to the people who run the center, TM is more than just a way to relax or gain insight. Why not just be honest about that? Since they aren't pushing that level of commitment on you (and they really aren't) what is wrong with just being upfront about their own beliefs?

Ultimately my concerns about TM being unethical and predatory were unfounded. The simplest explanation is that they aren't concerned with getting more of your money. They do offer more courses and retreats, but they have never been pushed on me. Getting off of their mailing list wasn't a hassle.

There is the issue of cost and while Lynch pretty much handled this situation terribly in the video it isn't really like what he said. First, I think the course is 1500, not 2500, and it is paid over the course of 5 months. So you only pay 200 something for the first session.

A number of people never came back for the rest of the course so they I *think* they didnt end up paying the rest. Again, I didnt pay for mine, and though TM has helped me immensely, and though I am not sure if I would pay 1500 for it, it seems if they were more interested in money this policy of breaking up payments doesn't seem a wise business move.

Also the retreats (which I have never been on) are modestly priced. 300 for a weekend is pretty reasonable.

As far as wht TM is, it is actually very different from other forms of meditation.

The point of TM is effortless thought, where other kinds of meditations are about focusing on ideas or actively suppressing thought. TM doesnt teach that any of these are right or wrong, or any less worthy of study, TM is just concerned with its approach.

This was a point of contention I had with my instructors. They insist that you shouldnt focus on or attach meaning to the thoughts that pop into your head during TM, but instead let them drift along. This is not what Lynch describes in his book, or the type of meditation that has provided me with inspiration and insight. TM insists that the benefits of TM occur outside of the meditation and because of it, not during a session.

When I told them that wasn't what I was interested in, they said that was fine, but that wasn't what they taught and I could meditate however I chose, but they could really only offer me guidance as far as the TM doctrine went.

This kind of patient dispassionate attitude pervades TM and really isnt a quality of a cult.

I still meditate regularly and follow the TM format somewhat, but do more of what lynch describes in his book. I've been back to the center a few times to say hi and give them updates on my life. They've never pushed another course on me and I've never taken one.

I'd say I'm satisfied with TM, moreso because I didn't have to pay for it.


That guy - 2015-04-01

We had a TM place in my neighborhood growing up, and the downsides you mention seemed to be the adult skeptical consensus of them.

I'd take those pseudo-medical claims as sufficient to write them off entirely, but that's just me.


Old_Zircon - 2015-04-01

"other kinds of meditations are about focusing on ideas or actively suppressing thought."

That is simply not true, if you were told that then you were lied to. Some may be, but

"They insist that you shouldnt focus on or attach meaning to the thoughts that pop into your head during TM, but instead let them drift along."

So pretty much exactly what you do in zazen.

Not saying there's necessarily anything sinister about TM, it just seems like it's taking simple sitting meditation and putting it in an expensive package. Which puts it fairly in the mainstream as far as this stuff goes. It's certainly been a big part of Japanese zen for the last century, give or take.


Old_Zircon - 2015-04-01

I think the actual act of meditation is a good thing though, don't get me wrong.


baleen - 2015-04-01

TM is completely harmless. It is not a predatory organization (or even a unified practice with centralized leadership) like scientology. My experience with it is that it's just a nonsecular way to get people meditating and taking better care of their bodies, but then spiritual organizations attract flies and self-proclaimed experts.

Like anything which dabbles with this kind of intense stuff, there will be charlatans and people taking advantage of people who are desperate for spiritual guidance or acceptance into any kind of community.


misterbuns - 2015-04-02

OZ, Yes, there are different kinds of meditation. I am not sure what your point is? You're saying there aren't different kinds of meditation?

Anyway, TM is a very specific kind.

It uses a mantra to encourage effortless thought, instead of making the mantra the focus of the meditation.

still not sure what your point is.


Maggot Brain - 2015-04-01

He has a cult? When did this happen?


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2015-04-01

Here's a list of celebrities who practice(d) TM. Included are Clint Eastwood, Mary Tyler Moore, Bill Hicks, Russell Brand, Stevie Wonder, Goldie Hawn, Mick Jagger, William Gibson, Merv Griffin, two Doors, three Beach Boys, and all four Beatles.

Is it a cult? I dunno, beats Scientology, I guess.


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2015-04-01

Oops, forgot to post the link:

http://tinyurl.com/q7yv6wf


boner - 2015-04-01

To be fair I think John Lennon & Ringo became disillusioned pretty damn fast.


Old_Zircon - 2015-04-01

It's funny that Lennon's reasoning was that Maharishi was living like a rock star, getting all the money cars and women he could, and Lennon for all his talk was still firmly entrenched in the fundamentally Judeo-Christian idea that spirituality means asceticism.


EnochEmery - 2015-04-01

Maybe not Scientology, but like them there have been allegations of abuse and human trafficking at their Fairfield Iowa compound (aka "Vedic City") culminating in an incident last year.
http://thegazette.com/2014/03/12/riot-of-indian-meditators-cau ses-concerns-for-fairfield-residents
http://www.heartlandconnection.com/news/story.aspx?id=1017547# .VRyoV5O3yv8


dairyqueenlatifah - 2015-04-01

I used to work with a guy who's dad charged big money to take people on retreats and teach them all about this stuff.

I never new it was a religious/cult thing. I just thought it was new age holistic alternative medicine witch doctor hippee bullshit.


Register or login To Post a Comment







Video content copyright the respective clip/station owners please see hosting site for more information.
Privacy Statement