| poeTV | Submit | Login   |

Reddit Digg Stumble Facebook

Help keep poeTV running


And please consider not blocking ads here. They help pay for the server. Pennies at a time. Literally.

Comment count is 29
John Holmes Motherfucker - 2015-10-09

I'm standing in a Walmart parking lot at about 1 a.m., so I'm not going to link to the petition, but as far as I'm concerned, it's gamer gate's crowning achievement. I've never seen such a heroic convergence of stupidity, vindictiveness, and hypocricy. I'm reminded of the end of ED WOOD, when ED is watching PLAN NINE, and says: "This is the one I'll be remembered for!"


jimmyboblahey - 2015-10-10

"I'm salty"
JHM 2015


Bobonne - 2015-10-09

Astounding.


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2015-10-10

https://www.change.org/p/federal-urge-the-us-to-arrest-ms-anita-sa rkeesian-and-ms-zoe-quinn-for-violating-the-logan-act


That guy - 2015-10-10

I'm sure that 18th C territory negotiation law or whatever isn't going to apply here.

There are more interesting, listenable videos than this on the subject, but maybe that was JHM's point?

Anyway, Sarky would be evil as fuck if she got her way on things, there's no doubt about that. I don't think the fact that gamers (all gamers must die, of course) threaten her changes the fact that she'd be a draconian overlady that Stalin and co. would be proud of.


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2015-10-10

>>There are more interesting, listenable videos than this on the subject, but maybe that was JHM's point?

If you're talking about Mundane Matt, I disagree.

>>Anyway, Sarky would be evil as fuck if she got her way on things, there's no doubt about that. I don't think the fact that gamers (all gamers must die, of course) threaten her changes the fact that she'd be a draconian overlady that Stalin and co. would be proud of.


https://youtu.be/BNsrK6P9QvI


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2015-10-10

>>Anyway, Sarky would be evil as fuck if she got her way on things, there's no doubt about that

You mean, if the SJWs were to stage an armed revolution, repeal the U.S. Constitution, and install Anita Sarkeesian as dictator for life? Because-- and I want to be COMPLETELY clear on this-- I'm against that.

>>I don't think the fact that gamers (all gamers must die, of course)

Oh, of course! (Jerk-off gesture)

>> threaten her changes the fact that she'd be a draconian overlady that Stalin and co. would be proud of.

I don't think the word "fact" means what you think it does.

If you were joking, please tell me and I'll apologize for mocking you. PLEASE, PLEASE tell me you were joking!


That guy - 2015-10-11

well, as usual in this subject area, fuck you JHM

she has enemies who are shitty and evil and insane
=/=
she's not shitty and evil and insane


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2015-10-11

>>well, as usual in this subject area, fuck you JHM

>>she has enemies who are shitty and evil and insane
=/=
>>she's not shitty and evil and insane


Well, fuck me, indeed!
I'M supposed to prove that she's NOT shitty, evil and insane, and I haven't.
ergo, SHE'S STALIN!

I don't really have a opinion about whether Anita Sarkeesian is shitty, evil and insane. But I do have an an opinion of this kind of logic you're using. Three words come to mind right away. Can you guess what they are?


That guy - 2015-10-11

John Holmes, motherfucker.


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2015-10-12

Really? In a context where the wasn't a big fat nonsequitor, this might be a good comeback. Congratulations, however, on the accurate word count.


That guy - 2015-10-12

There's no chance of Sarky being brought up on light treason, nor of her dreams becoming reality. She would be a monster if she had any real power.

All this is clear to you, right? Do you really want to come to her defense over whether she'd be a horrible tyrant? Saying you don't like my logic (meaning some rhetorical move I made) is stupid quibbling.


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2015-10-12

It's not a minor point of rhetoric, its the biggest honking logical fallacy EVER. "Disprove it or its true.". And its taken you light years out of your way. Here on planet earth, we were talking about YouTube videos.

This is what misogyny is all about, the fear of women's power, exaggerated into a twisted nightmare. If she's allowed to lost her pop culture videos without any harassment or character assassination, the first domino will fall.

There's almost no one who would make a good dictator. That's why there are so few good dictators.


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2015-10-12

Once again, I oppose the "ALL GAMERS MUST DIE" Initiative, although as Gamergate continues, my opposition has softened just a bit.


That guy - 2015-10-12

"all gamers must die" = me joking

Sarky the tyrant: there's no way she wouldn't lump threats with "fuck you, bitch" and try to outlaw them both.

I did not say "disprove it or it's true", in the above sentence or previously. I posit that these things are true and you don't like it. Also I said that just because her enemies are shits doesn't mean she's not a shit.


Spaceman Africa - 2015-10-12

I urge everyone here to sign this so that we can save video games


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2015-10-12

Look, you jive turley, right now in the real world, people are using propaganda, character assassination and harassment in an attempt to impose mob rule and suppress unpopular opinions, and I'm supposed to care aboutsome hypothetical future dystopeia where no one can say" fuck you bitch"? Fuck you bitch.

Go on and delude yourself that you're defending free space. I wouldn't have the heart to force the truth on you, as if anyone could.


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2015-10-12

uh, defending free speech


That guy - 2015-10-13

"people are using propaganda, character assassination and harassment in an attempt to impose mob rule and suppress unpopular opinions"

a) this is what thousands of people like Sarky are doing to American universities, where ideas should be shouted down the least

b) and the alternative is to ban these uses of words on the internet? Those aren't threats. Threats are threats.

c) "in an attempt to impose mob rule and suppress unpopular opinions"

LITERAL mob rule??
And by "suppress unpopular opinions" what do you mean..?
Do you mean with jackboots, or just shouting them down? Those are some weighted words, JHM. And they're kinda misleading. Sounds like propaganda to me.
You don't detect the irony in defending Sarky by saying she's up against propaganda seeking to suppress unpopular opinion? On the same page as this video??

You just don't like it when it's not for you side.
I like you JHM, but man are you a dipshit white knight sometimes. You are the first person I've ever called "white knight" on the internet. Congrats.


Caminante Nocturno - 2015-10-10

Sometimes I wonder why we don't spend more time talking about the suckers that give Quinn and Sarkeesian money, and then I remember that some of you are those suckers.


Baron_Von_Bad_Beaver - 2015-10-10

Money for nothing,
But no chicks for me


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2015-10-10

Just think of the fascinating conversation we could be having!


Knobinal
Boy those people who gave money to Anita Sarkeessian sure were suckers!

Dat guy
Don't even get me started.

Knobinal
I know, right?

Dat Guy
All Gamers must die, of course!

Knobinal
It's the final solution. SARKEESIAN UBER ALLES!

Dat guy
*****


StanleyPain - 2015-10-10

But not quite as big suckers as the ones who donated to the Tropes Vs. men project which literally stole the money. Or any of the other anti-feminist kickstarter-y bullshit projects which either never materialized or, if they did, were of such inept value that the term sucker is not even near enough.

Let's not forget the people who have donated money to groups like AVFM only to have their money basically being used to pay off debts and such instead of..I dunno..going towards men's rights.


roscar - 2015-10-10

The people who gave money to Anita Sarkeessian's kickstarter got exactly what they wanted. An all right feminist critique of videogames and the tears of angry gamers.


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2015-10-11

Here's an excellent article on just how full JohnBirch/GlennBeck/AlexJones the gators have gone since Anita and Zoe spoke at the UN, lobbying for world censorship and announcing the new world order.

The 13 Most Ridiculous Things #GamerGaters Have Said About Anita and Zoe’s UN Visit (Reddit Edition)

http://wehuntedthemammoth.com/2015/09/28/the-13-most-ridiculou s-things-gamergaters-have-said-about-anita-and-zoes-un-visit-reddi t-edition/


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2015-10-10

What it's like to watch The Sarkeesian Effect

https://youtu.be/-IEEdRS9YJc

FROM WE HUNTED THE MAMMOTH

Here are 8 Classic Films that Cost Less Than The Sarkeesian Effect to Make.

1) Following, directed by Christopher Nolan

Budget 00 (1998); ,772 (in 2015 dollars)

IMDb rating: 7.6/10

Following was Nolan’s first feature film, an ingenious, twisty psychological thriller; I think it’s his second-best film, after Memento.
2) Primer, directed by Shane Carruth

Budget: ,000 (2004); ,831 (in 2015 dollars)

IMDb rating: 7/10

I found this time-travel puzzlebox of a movie overcomplicated and overrated — try TimeCrimes instead — but it’s an amazing accomplishment for 00.
3) Paranormal Activity, directed by Oren Peli

Budget ,000 (2007); ,240 (in 2015 dollars)

IMDb rating: 6.3/10

Not exactly a work of great artistry, but a genuinely creepy film that cost almost nothing to make and, for better or worse, launched a franchise. The version ultimately released in theaters had a pumped-up Hollywood ending added to it that cost more than the rest of the film cost to make, but I actually prefer the original ending.
4) El Mariachi, directed by Robert Rodriguez

Budget: ,000 (1992); ,986 (in 2015 dollars)

IMDb rating: 6.0/10

A visually striking action classic by the soon-to-be action/horror movie king Robert Rodriguez.
5) Slacker, directed by Richard Linklater

Budget: ,000 (1991); ,244 (in 2015 dollars)

IMDb rating: 7.1/10

Linklater’s sprawling, complex and often hilarious feature film debut.
6) Clerks, directed by Kevin Smith

Budget: ,000 (1994); ,419 (in 2015 dollars)

IMDb rating: 7.9/10

Kevin Smith’s celebrated debut.
7) Catfish, directed by Henry Joost and Ariel Schulman

Budget ,000 (2010); ,787 (in 2015 dollars)

IMDb rating: 7.1/10

A charming little documentary that added a new word to the lexicon and birthed an MTV series.
8) Eraserhead, by David Lynch

Budget: ,000 (1977); ,326 (in 2015 dollars)

IMDb rating: 7.4/10

Yes, that’s right. FUCKING ERASERHEAD, David Lynch’s surrealistic classic, with arresting, years-ahead-of-their-time visuals and innovative sound design to boot, COST LESS TO MAKE THAN THE SARKEESIAN EFFECT. Even after inflation.

What its like watching The Sarkeesian Effect

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IEEdRS9YJc


Cena_mark - 2015-10-10

You're an idiot if you don't think The Dark Knight is Nolan's best film.


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2015-10-10

I haven't seen all of Nolan's films, but I have seen Memento. I'm not sure that Memento is better, but I'm sure that thinking that Memento is better wouldn't make you an idiot.

Anyway, The Dark Knight probably cost more to make than the Sarkeesian Effect.


SDAusmus - 2015-10-11

I have a soft spot for "Insomnia", which is probably the most underrated of Nolan's works, probably because it's a remake of an (arguably) superior film.


Register or login To Post a Comment







Video content copyright the respective clip/station owners please see hosting site for more information.
Privacy Statement