| poeTV | Submit | Login   |

Reddit Digg Stumble Facebook
Desc:Wouldn't wipe his ass on the poster, it might give him herpes.
Category:Religious
Tags:avgn, ghostbuster, everytime he says Its shit, take a drink
Submitted:John Holmes Motherfucker
Date:06/01/16
Views:1981
Rating:
View Ratings
Register to vote for this video
Buy Song:iTunes - Amazon

People Who Liked This Video Also Liked:
Gayyyyyming community
Ghanian casket dance.
QuartuvLarry on Obama's approval rating
Roman Candle Headshot
Toronto Mayor Rob Ford finally admits smoking crack
The Tooncinator
The Pain & Empowerment of Choosing Your Own Gender: Alok Vaid-Menon
What You Don't Know About Your iPhone 5
Sinking Miata in Baton Rouge
Bear Buys Some Beer, Teleports

Help keep poeTV running


And please consider not blocking ads here. They help pay for the server. Pennies at a time. Literally.

Comment count is 49
Cena_mark - 2016-06-01

SQWs are such crybabies.


Born in the RSR - 2016-06-01

Did you misspell that or is that a new thing?


Cena_mark - 2016-06-01

SQWs are Status Quo Warriors. Whereas SJWs fight for justice and equality, SQWs fight to maintain inequality. I've been throwing it around mainly for the reactions it gets from the SQWs, who shit their pants when they realize they're not the only ones who can give another group a pejorative nickname.


bawbag - 2016-06-01

I'm going to borrow this SQW terminology, cheers Cena!


Cena_mark - 2016-06-01

I picked up from somebody else here first. But spread it around. It is fun to use.


themilkshark - 2016-06-01

SQW is my new favorite thing!


memedumpster - 2016-06-01

I'm just going to call the SQWares.


Two Jar Slave - 2016-06-01

All my stars and garters.


Gmork - 2016-06-01

Stars for SQW.


Xenocide - 2016-06-02

Stars for SQW's, additional stars for SQWares.

BONUS: You can call the homophobic ones SQWeers. They'll be too angry to notice that it's actually pretty forced.


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2016-06-02

i think James Rolfe does some great work. His video on the 40 shittiest shark movies is a youtube classic. I respect the guy, and I would have respected his Ghostbusters video a lot more if he'd waited for the critics who ARE going to see the movie to speak first. Getting out in front of them like that is a dick move, and that's why the mainstream media singled him out for criticism., and making him the face of this controversy.

Which is unfortunate. There's plenty of misogyny in the backlash against this hypothetical movie no one has seen, and the best evidence for this is that we're being given EVERY OTHER POSSIBLE REASON for the backlash, and some of them frankly contradict each other. It's too much like the original. It's not enough like the original. It's an example of shity PC filmmaking. It's racist.

But Rolfe may be the exception. he seems to be motivated by a reverence for the original that I find touching, but silly... uh, I mean, misplaced. Most of his objections can be boiled down to the idea that the new movie doesn't take enough pains to kiss the ass of the sacred original, a movie so old that there are kids in the fourth grade whose parents weren't born yet,

If you were a child in the eighties, you were probably allowed to see the PG Ghostbusters, but were forbiidden to see R rated movies like Animal House, Porky's and the first Police Academy movies, and you probably weren't interested in seeing Fletch. This would explain how so many of the original Ghostbuster's rabid fans seem so unaware of what a vile seedbed of soulless 80s cliches the original is. I recently bought my own copy, and I still think it's entertaining but overrated. The thrills and laughs are there, but they float on a sea of eighties movie bullshit.

The first time we see our hero, Dr. Peter Venkman, he's literally torturing a male student with electric shocks so the student will leave, and he can scam a female student (around half his age) into having sex with him. Now, I'm not being politically correct here. I'm not offended by this, and I don't think that kids who see this will go on to torture anyone. What I'm saying is that we've left humanity behind, and entered a world inhabited by script devices.

Eighties comedies liked to give us comic heroes whose conduct would be unforgivable in a real life universe and then put them in a universe that makes them forgivable. Ghostbusters accomplishes this in the usual way, by surrounding the heroes with men who are less attractive, and less "manly" by comparison. The dean, the male librarian, the hotel manager, a musician, the accountant played by Rick Moranis-- these characters are all ineffectual, and most of them are subtly effeminate. To use the current vernacular, they're all cucks.

The main plot of Ghostbusters is simple. REALLY simple. We can capture the ghosts, but don't cross the streams. Thiings are getting worse, we'd better cross the streams.

That's it. They don't really interact with the ghosts or with zule, or the stay-puft marshmallow man. That's why the script needs to invent a bellicose EPA inspector, Walter Peck, AKA DICKLESS, so the movie can have some perfunctory, contrived conflict. Nothing this guy says or does makes any sense. If he's convinced that they're storing toxic materials, why would he order the plug pulled on the containment facility? Doesn't matter. He's there to be defied, mocked, his manhood insulted in the most obvious way, and finally to be drenched with marshmallow bukakke.


StanleyPain - 2016-06-01

Ever notice how the people proclaiming how they are these brave, bold, mighty culture warriors who "controversy" is some kind of badge of honor are always the biggest fucking pussies on the planet about EVERYTHING?
SJWs are supposedly the whiny ones, but nope...they ain't got shit on this manbaby internet culture bullshit that is breeding the biggest fucking crybabies in human history.


Cena_mark - 2016-06-01

It's like the people who hate political correctness (likely the same crowd). Expose them to PC language and they get bent out of shape, ranting and raving about how PC culture is fascism.


Cena_mark - 2016-06-01

All this essentially started from whiners whining about their childhoods being raped. I get it. It sucks when shitty remakes and reboots are made of your beloved childhood franchises. If the movie sucks, don't see it. It can't be that much worse than Ghostbusters II.
BTW, The Rock will star in a remake of Big Trouble in Little China. I for one think that is an awesome casting decision.


animegurl1000 - 2016-06-01

You liberal cucks are the REAL Nazis because you don't agree that minorities should be treated like second-class citizens.


animegurl1000 - 2016-06-01

Did people in 1978 complain this much about their childhoods being raped before the remake to Invasion of the Body Snatchers was released?


BHWW - 2016-06-01

Were there about a bajillion thinkpieces and people complaining about how it was ___ist to think the new Bodysnatchers didn't look good or that only angry nerdy manbaby sexist Hitlerpigs could possible hate it?

Indeed, with the recent waves of lame reboots, you didn't see this sort of thing with Total Recall or Red Dawn or whatever, there wasn't a constant buzz about how legions of moronic sexists monsters were hating on them and that's awful.

It's not like there haven't been any dicks who went Not Gonna See the New GB, They Womaned It All Up. But that, much like how, supposedly there were armies of MRA manbabies hating Mad Max: Fury Road for being feminist and so on, it's not been a significant response to the movie, it's been made to seem that way by media and bloggers.


BHWW - 2016-06-01

Like there was some dick posting to a PUA blog with some Twitter followers who wrote a piece about how I WILL NEVER SEE FURY ROAD BECAUSE IT'S A VAGINA TRAVESTY and the whole Internet seized on it for a week as proof that there was a HUGE anti-feminist womanhater backlash against the movie.

My core objection to this whole sorta mess is that way before The Media realized they could make big click money stoking the flames, it's really just the same old flame war bullshit, slapfights over entertainment, the same-old drawing lines in the sand over pop-culture.

These sort of controversies aren't really about politics at all, or civil rights, or any social issues. It's just the worst nerds, the kind who can't hear anybody say they don't like Star Trek or Star Wars or a videogame franchise, etc. without crying about it - even when they're forty - and they found a bunch of new jargon to wrap their BOO HOO WHY DID MY FAVORITE TV SHOW NOBODY WATCHED GO OFF THE AIR, IT IS A CRIME sort of bullshit in.

That and a bunch of pretend nerds - of various genders and ideologies and so on - who've glommed onto this pop-culture controversy shit because they hope they can leverage it into a book deal or get on the TV or promotion for their blogging site or whatever. And the hopefully soon-to-collapse Nu-Media trying to stir shit up for clicks, giggles and cash.

And then we're down to the nitpickery of escapist indulgences as our political battlegrounds, or using the heavy weaponry of politics for our pop-cultural taste wars to nitpick other people's tastes.


Old_Zircon - 2016-06-01

The trouble really began when the nerds realized that they could leverage the Internet to run smear campaigns and ruin their opponents careers or worse.


Which is a tactic that transcends ideology. The Internet far left were probably doing it first (it's documented at least back to the late 90s) but the Internet right probably do it more.

Anyone who tells you that their side doesn't send death threats is either incredibly naive, profiting from partisan drama, or is one of the ones sending death threats.


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2016-06-02

>>>The trouble really began when the nerds realized that they could leverage the Internet to run smear campaigns and ruin their opponents careers or worse.

Can they? Anita Sarkeesian was on Colbert, Zoe Quinn wrote a memoir, and the word is that Scarlett Johansen wants to play her in the movies. Gamergaters like to claim they've cost game sites "thousands of dollars in ad revenue." i don't know how they determine that, and It's almost sad to see them cling to that as proof that they've been effective. ALMOST sad. Mostly, it's hilarious.

I wasn't planning on seeing this before, but now I'm counting the days-- not out of spite, but because I'm determined to see this before any reviews come out, so i can form my own opinon. Certainly people will be seeing out of spite. So they're pretty much selling tickets. If it's a hit, and Melissa McCarthy has had hit after hit, everybody who says they aren't going to see it is going to see it anyway.


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2016-06-02

It's not that their childhoods are being raped. It's more like their childhoods are raping their adulthoods.


BHWW - 2016-06-01

While this guy is no good, the response to Rolfe's rather tepid, dorky video was over the top. On twitter alone, the Ghostbusters tag brought up minefields of "stand up comics" with blue-tick verified accounts defending the shit heap trailers while failing to post a single funny line. Just lots of butthurt snark and people saying the same shit over and over about how only nerd losers could NOT like the trailers much less the concept of the New Ghostbuster film. "You don't think this Ghostbusters reboot looks good? Well, uh, you got a poopy diaper and a you're a dumb man baby stupidhead!"

As well as variations on "LMAO look at these stupid NERDS get mad about Ghostbusters" - bloggers that talks about nerd shit for a living.

And of course "I love Ghostbusters...but the time is right for a remake because the original is a shitty movie and it's dumb and childish!"

And the comments about Rolfe himself, like this:

https://67.media.tumblr.com/e182c0462ffb17dc05f5ff112cb5cef5/t umblr_inline_o7ctho8mWB1s8fda7_540.png

Hurr hurr this nerd is married? Ha ha, who would marry this stupid nerd.

And the latest round of thinkpieces on the "soft sexism" of "hating on" the Ghostbusters reboot, which makes me wonder if this is some sort of stealth marketing, in that the people who made the movie are desperately beating an MRAS HATE THIS MOVIE drum because The "Whole" Internet Hated It.


Cena_mark - 2016-06-01

That is a good point. The war over this movie is no longer about the movie, perhaps it never was. The film looks meh, and we can't tell at this point who drew first blood.


Caminante Nocturno - 2016-06-01

We can't tell who drew first blood? Is that supposed to excuse your part in it?

All of this noise about MRAs and sexism in regards to this movie is clearly a blatant, naked attempt by marketing and trash journalism to get attention and publicity. It's pathetic how many people are falling for it. It's pathetic how many of YOU are clearly falling for it.

The people who won't stop whining about sexists and bigotry in pop culture really are no worse than the people they're whining about. Hell, they're worse, because they're the exact same as the people they're whining about, but they're doing it with the delusion of having some kind of high ground.


memedumpster - 2016-06-01

When a wild Pikachu runs through your living room, you don't question whether or not you're misappropriating the blanket when you grab it to pounce the little fucker to unload on the Asian aphrodisiac market.

Sometimes, in life, it's not about what you weaponize to stress-shorten the mortal coils of bigots, it's that you do. The more people scream and rage about it, the more years get taken off their actual lives.

This movie is a mankiller!


BHWW - 2016-06-01

I can see certain people who post here showing up at a theater for the GB reboot, even though it's empty, just sitting in the dark, laughing loudly to themselves and saying to no one in particular "THIS IS HILLARIOUS!" and "OH I BET THOSE MANBABIES ARE WEEPING NERD TEARS OVER THIS" and cackling a bit like Sam Neill at the end of In the Mouth of Madness.


SolRo - 2016-06-01

And I can see you manbabies spending more time ranting on it than I ever will care about it.

Check your SQW persecution complex.


Potrod - 2016-06-01

I see BHWW gets lumped in with the manbabies because he doesn't want to actively participate in the 2 minutes hate.

"This guy is no good," "tepid, dorky video" -- not strong enough!


Potrod - 2016-06-01

Anyway the entire thing has blown up idiotically and exponentially since it's the internet, and not wanting any part of it seems like a fairly reasonable position to take.


Cena_mark - 2016-06-01

I care the least about this. I win.


Xenocide - 2016-06-02

"YOU'RE the ones taking this too seriously!" said the guy who wrote seven paragraphs defending the guy who spent 45 minutes whining about the Ghostbusters having ovaries.


Cena_mark - 2016-06-02

OOOOOH! Knockout punch from Xenocide. 5 Stars!


BHWW - 2016-06-02

What? This RPG Guy, whoever he is, some LPer, is a clown. He spent 40 minutes of standard Angry Sweary Person Vlogging on this less-than-stellar defense of Rolfe.

Me, I think Rolfe's a dork, doesn't seem to have much taste for an adult nerd who has made a career out of complaining about old cartridge games, but the response, the hate and scorn this video game reviewer has gotten for saying he thinks he'll pass on an upcoming movie in which he barely mentioned the gender of the main cast is disproportionate.

A lot of the people that have been writing about this seem like they've been crying about how awful it is that there have been complaints about the trailers, so they were desperate to lash out at anyone and Rolfe fit the bill. Politics and everything else has gotten mixed up into this mess, with people carrying on about how people MUST watch this shitty reboot made by a multi-billion dollar corporation OR ELSE you're on the wrong side of history.

So, excuse me if, tired of seeing even here on old POETV some buffoons spouting the same drivel about how evil patriarchalists and manchildren are the only ones who could possibly not like this film, I feel the need to articulate my thoughts on the whole mess.

Nobody can win with the Xenocides and SolRos here, of course. Take longer than a paragraph to sort out your opinion and they'll go for the LOL YOU WROTE ALL THAT, DUMMY reply every time, as well as LOL U MAD?


SolRo - 2016-06-02

sorry I haven't been following the news on this bad movie as obsessively as you have so I haven't noticed any mass media conspiracies to defame innocent men of peace.

do perhaps have a list of all the horrible REVERSE SEXISM news articles compiled on an MRA forum thread somewhere that I could review?


BHWW - 2016-06-02

"Heh, you obsessive weirdo"

:guys like JHM and Evil Homer post novellas in comments to GB movies:

There was no vast conspiracy to defame Rolfe, as Potrod said "the entire thing has blown up idiotically and exponentially since it's the internet". It's how it happens, I mean I thought you'd be internet savvy enough to figure it out - despite your constant excursions into flailing dipshit territory you don't seem that dumb.


EvilHomer - 2016-06-02

Hey! At 27,162 words total, "Something Sweet to Bite" does indeed qualify as a novella; however, I only posted a short selection from its opening pages, well under the requisite word count for a novella.


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2016-06-02

>>I can see certain people who post here showing up at a theater for the GB reboot, even though it's empty, just sitting in the dark, laughing loudly to themselves and saying to no one in particular "THIS IS HILLARIOUS!" and "OH I BET THOSE MANBABIES ARE WEEPING NERD TEARS OVER THIS" and cackling a bit like Sam Neill at the end of In the Mouth of Madness.

You mean like you're doing right now,, fantasizing out loud about the utter and complete failure of a movie that no one has seen? See, I'm not the one who makes these predictions. If it sucks, I'll be disappointed, but there are no videos of me talking about how the trailer proves that it sucks.

And I take no joy in nerd tears. If the movie is good, the Ghostbuster fans will probably go ahead and see it, and probably they'll like it, and we'll all get used to the idea of female ghostbusters. Weird as it sounds, I'll consider that to be an important cultural victory.


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2016-06-02

>>>If it sucks, I'll be disappointed, but there are no videos of me talking about how the trailer proves that it sucks.

Probably should have said

If it sucks, I'll be disappointed, but there are no videos of me talking about how the trailer proves that it's going to be a masterpiece.


EvilHomer - 2016-06-02

Candy

A bat flit across the face of a monstrous harvest moon, its leathery wings sweeping through the chill autumn mist, leaving swirls and spirals in its wake. The creature of the night flew back and forth, eating the last bugs of the season. Fat as it was, the bat would need every scrap of weight it could put on before the harsh winter months. Already a few of its fellows had secluded themselves in caves and hollow trees, snug and plump, lost in the half sleep that would last until spring. A moth stirred from the grass, its gossamer wings making it a pale ghost in the moonlight. A quick snap of tiny jaws and the mouthful was gobbled down. With a surge of its wings, the bat flew on into the night. As it neared a barn blazing with light, the creature became somewhat curious. Usually at this time of night the barn would be empty, dark and inviting for one of its kind. Instead the bat could hear the sounds of ponies busily at work inside.

It would’ve flown closer for a better look, but a sudden chill down its spine made it think twice. An instinct, that even it barely understood, screamed loud and clear in the bats tiny head. Danger! Best to move on and find more prey. Best to find a safe spot and sleep the deep, dreamless sleep of hibernation. Best to go far, far from here to do it. There was nothing here for a tiny bat. Nothing but death.

------------------------

“Applebloom!”called Applejack, putting the last batch of caramel apples on a tray lined with waxed paper to cool. Benches set up in the barn lined the walls, half filled with the sugar coated fruit. “Where has that filly gotten off to?” she muttered to herself. A cauldron, half empty but for a hissing puddle of sweet brown syrup, cooled over a pile of smouldering coals just outside the barn door. The barn itself was warm and snug, filled with lantern light and the sweet scent of sugary treats. Quite the contrast to the chill night outside. Even so, Applejack couldn’t help drawing the cool air into her lungs with a satisfied smile as she stepped out to look for her sister. She loved this time of year. Winter would be here soon enough it was true, and that had its own work and worry, just like spring and summer. But the autumn months, after the harvest, were a time of relaxation and fun for the Apple Family. With the crops in, safe and sound, money would come rolling into Sweet Apple Acres before too long. It was a tradition in their family to share the wealth, and what better way than to provide all kinds of apple themed treats and games for the kiddies for Nightmare Night?

Nightmare Night. It was the first holiday to come after the harvest, so the Apple Family always did it big! Of course, the holiday had always been more about treats than tricks at Sweet Apple Acres. Every year Granny Smith would have tubs set up in Ponyville for the townsfolk to bob for apples. She had taken to turning in early and letting Applejack make sure they stayed full of crisp, delicious apples; Even so, Granny Smith was still an important part of the festival. Every year, since Big Mac was old enough to pull a plow, he’d offer hay rides for the community as well. Even Applebloom seemed to be taking more of an interest in the festivities. Last year she’d gone around with Pinkie Pie collecting candy with her friends, but this year she seemed to be really interested in helping Applejack make up a few homemade treats to pass out at the festival in town. A few of the recipes Applebloom was trying out seemed a mite odd, but Applejack didn’t mind trying new things so long as they were able to finish making their batch of usual treats as well. The only problem was, after helping Applejack spear a few apples and dip them in the bubbling caramel, Applebloom seemed to have quickly lost interest and wandered off to do her own thing.

Really, Applejack shouldn’t have been surprised. Applebloom had a habit of getting distracted by the least little thing. They should have been done making treats hours ago, but as it was, she still had about half the apples left to dip. Worse, she was running low on caramel and firewood. “Applebloom!” called Applejack again as she went to the side of the barn where the wood pile was kept to get a few fresh sticks, “Wherever ya’ve run off to, get yer flank back over here missy! We got a lot of apples left ta dip a'fore we store 'em in the barn to dry, and we’re gonna be burnin' the midnight oil with all yer dilly dally’in!” The country pony paused and listened. The fog that curled through the orchard tonight did strange things to the familiar sounds of the farm, muffling noises that Applejack would normally find comforting and amplifying those she couldn’t identify. She didn’t hear the sound of any tiny hooves coming her way, nor did she hear her little sister’s voice calling out in response. What she thought she heard was giggling. High, girlish giggling just on the edge of her hearing. It wasn’t something anypony wanted to hear all alone on a dark night. “Easy girl, yer just spookin' yerself,” Applejack reassured herself under her breath as she quickly piled a few dry branches on her back for the fire.

She really wished that Granny Smith didn’t go to sleep so early and that Big Macintosh wasn’t off in town helping set up for tomorrows celebrations. More than anything she wished Applebloom would stop wandering off on her own. A farm was no place for a young filly to go exploring by herself, especially at night. Applejack had heard too many horror stories of colts playing around on farm equipment and hurting themselves. Perhaps more dreadful were the stories of fillies falling into old sink holes or boarded up wells and nopony finding them until months later, if they found them at all. A thought suddenly occurred to Applejack as she headed back towards the front of the barn. “Applebloom yew better not be'a plannin’ on trickin’ me! It ain't Nightmare Night just yet!" when there was no answer she tried, "Ah’ll tell Big Macintosh on yew!” There was still no answer. At least no answer she wanted to acknowledge as being more than a figment of her imagination.

As she rounded the side of the barn, a sudden burst of flame whooshed into life, painting the fog bright orange. Applejack jumped back, the firewood she carried on her back scattering at her hooves. She almost bolted, there and then, but calmed down when she realized the flames were under the cauldron. Somepony had gotten the fire going again while she’d been out back at the woodpile. Had Applebloom gone to fetch more wood and she’d just missed her going around the other side of the barn? As Applejack drew closer she saw that whomever had built up the fire had used too much fuel. The flames were licking up the side of the cauldron, bright and hungry. Already she could see that the caramel that had been left in the pot was bubbling up. At this rate it would burn and blacken, going completely to waste. “Oh Applebloom, sweetie, ya can’t use that much wood! Ya need a low heat for this kind'a treat.”

She went to drag the cauldron out of the fire and save what she could of the caramel, careful to avoid the leaping, flickering flames, but found the old pot wouldn’t budge. It was usually only this heavy when it was full, not half empty like it was. Applejack did the best she could, tugging the cauldron inch by inch away from the barn. Once it was on a patch of damp dirt she went about kicking sand over what flames she could, trying to tame the wild fire. The flames subdued a bit, so Applejack decided she’d try to get her sisters help to get the cauldron back in place. “Applebloom, you in here?” asked Applejack as she cantered into the barn. The lanterns had all been blown out. By the light from the fire, Applejack could tell that the barn was empty on the inside. Empty that is, save for a pile of sticky Popsicle sticks that used to have caramel apples on the end, sitting boldly on the benches. Even the apples that hadn't been dipped yet were missing. A tiny voice, a girls voice whispered, “hungry,” and then giggled sweetly. So that was what was going on!

“Applebloom, Ah can’t believe yew! Those treats were for tomorrow, to share with all the fillies and colts that came lookin' for sweets ta bite! How could yew and yer friends be so selfish as ta eat the lot a'fore they even had a chance ta dry!?” Sweetie Belle and Scootaloo had to be in on this. Sweet Apple Acres produce might be good enough that a filly would like to try to eat a whole bushel in one go, but one filly couldn’t have eaten all the apples Applejack had dipped. Even three managing it was a stretch, but that was the only logical conclusion she could come to. “Applebloom get out here young missy! Yew and yer friends! Or Ah swear, Ah’ll be writing Celestia a letter about how Ah learned how ta break a fillies rump with mah bare hooves!”

Still there was nothing but silence. Well... Almost. There was that high, girlish giggling again. It sounded like... It sounded like it was coming from the cauldron,but that couldn't be right. It didn’t make any sense. How could the girls be hiding in that bubbling hot mess? Applejack moved tentatively towards the cauldron, her eyes darting back and forth. Beyond the glow of the fire, there was nothing but darkness, mist, and fading moonlight. The smoke from the partially quenched fire burned her eyes as she looked into the big black pot, ready to jump back at the first sign of a trick. She froze. Her eyes locked on to the sad, shriveled up figure curled into a ball at the bottom of the pot. She was completely covered in bubbling brown sugar, but even so, Applejack could tell right away the tiny figure was her sister.

She screamed. Applejack reached into the cauldron with her bare hooves, burning her limbs on the still hot metal as she closed them around Applebloom’s unmoving form, the pain of her seared flesh nothing compared to the agony that tore at her heart. How had this happened!? Had her sister somehow fallen in!? Why hadn’t she cried out!? Why hadn’t she screamed!? Applejack ran into the barn where there was a trough of water and quickly dunked Applebloom’s body into the cold liquid. The caramel was already starting to set, the sticky gunk wouldn’t come off. Applejack did the best she could, but a part of her knew it was already too late. Her sister wasn’t breathing. She tried hammering on her tiny chest, put her mouth to her sisters and breathed air into her lungs. It did nothing but leave a sickly sweet taste in her mouth, pieces of half dried caramel sticking to her lips. That was too much for her. She fell back on her haunches, wiping at her mouth with her hoof, trying to get rid of the taste... The taste of death and candy. She felt her gorge rise as tears pricked the corners of her eyes. How could this have happened? She blamed herself. What kind of a horrible sister was she?


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2016-06-02

i think James Rolfe does some great work. His video on the 40 shittiest shark movies is a youtube classic. I respect the guy, and I would have respected his Ghostbusters video a lot more if he'd waited for the critics who ARE going to see the movie to speak first. Getting out in front of them like that is a dick move, and that's why the mainstream media singled him out for criticism., and making him the face of this controversy.

Which is unfortunate. There's plenty of misogyny in the backlash against this hypothetical movie no one has seen, and the best evidence for this is that we're being given EVERY OTHER POSSIBLE REASON for the backlash, and some of them frankly contradict each other. It's too much like the original. It's not enough like the original. It's an example of shity PC filmmaking. It's racist.

But Rolfe may be the exception. he seems to be motivated by a reverence for the original that I find touching, but silly... uh, I mean, misplaced. Most of his objections can be boiled down to the idea that the new movie doesn't take enough pains to kiss the ass of the sacred original, a movie so old that there are kids in the fourth grade whose parents weren't born yet,

If you were a child in the eighties, you were probably allowed to see the PG Ghostbusters, but were forbiidden to see R rated movies like Animal House, Porky's and the first Police Academy movies, and you probably weren't interested in seeing Fletch. This would explain how so many of the original Ghostbuster's rabid fans seem so unaware of what a vile seedbed of soulless 80s cliches the original is. I recently bought my own copy, and I still think it's entertaining but overrated. The thrills and laughs are there, but they float on a sea of eighties movie bullshit.

The first time we see our hero, Dr. Peter Venkman, he's literally torturing a male student with electric shocks so the student will leave, and he can scam a female student (around half his age) into having sex with him. Now, I'm not being politically correct here. I'm not offended by this, and I don't think that kids who see this will go on to torture anyone. What I'm saying is that we've left humanity behind, and entered a world inhabited by script devices.

Eighties comedies liked to give us comic heroes whose conduct would be unforgivable in a real life universe and then put them in a universe that makes them forgivable. Ghostbusters accomplishes this in the usual way, by surrounding the heroes with men who are less attractive, and less "manly" by comparison. The dean, the male librarian, the hotel manager, a musician, the accountant played by Rick Moranis-- these characters are all ineffectual, and most of them are subtly effeminate. To use the current vernacular, they're all cucks.

The main plot of Ghostbusters is simple. REALLY simple. We can capture the ghosts, but don't cross the streams. Thiings are getting worse, we'd better cross the streams.

That's it. They don't really interact with the ghosts or with zule, or the stay-puft marshmallow man. That's why the script needs to invent a bellicose EPA inspector, Walter Peck, AKA DICKLESS, so the movie can have some perfunctory, contrived conflict. Nothing this guy says or does makes any sense. If he's convinced that they're storing toxic materials, why would he order the plug pulled on the containment facility? Doesn't matter. He's there to be defied, mocked, his manhood insulted in the most obvious way, and finally to be drenched with marshmallow bukakke.


Bootymarch - 2016-06-03

He seems like a nice man that really loves movies, it's a nostalgic thing for him. I'm sure he'd agree with you. Before this, I think James Rolfe's most controversial position was railing against pennies.


memedumpster - 2016-06-02

I wish I had submitted this. I would right now change the title to "45 paragraphs of rambling insanity about the NewGhostbusters."


EvilHomer - 2016-06-02

Normally I like it when people care about things, but part of me wishes people cared a little less about *this*.


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2016-06-02

I'm fine with this. As I explained above, the original Ghostbusters is spring loaded with alpha male bullshit. It makes sense to make a female version, and it makes sense for these puffed-up marshmallow men to be threatened by it.


memedumpster - 2016-06-02

DC is looking at all this publicity and writing Zack Snyder's pink slip, so it isn't all bad.


EvilHomer - 2016-06-02

I don't know, John, I'm still not convinced.


Bootymarch - 2016-06-03

Stop the internet, I want to get off.


Kid Fenris - 2016-06-02

It's one thing to see a trailer and say "Eh, not for me." But if you're gonna make a 45-minute video about not reviewing a movie, just review the damn thing already.

Salting the bird's tail and all that.


Raggamuffin - 2016-06-02

These guys think they are Ray, Egon, Venkman, even Winston. Little do they realize they are all just Walter Peck.


Register or login To Post a Comment







Video content copyright the respective clip/station owners please see hosting site for more information.
Privacy Statement