Virtuous titties and butts.

No, they are correct, it's virtue.

They definitely aren't correct.

No, they are. Looking sexy may not be as bad a thing as Mormons and/or feminists like to think, but personality beats looks, any day of the week. Integrity and brains > tits and butt.

I gotta ask EvilHomer, how do you live your life that you're getting hassled by feminists all the time? There is still a pay gap, y'know. And a whole lot of other forms of institutionalized misogyny. These are bigger deals than whatever your problem with feminists are.

I live in Northern California one town over from Humboldt State University so don't tell me "you don't live where I do."

"Just trollin', bro!" is a acceptable answer, though.

Who said I had a problem with feminists? The virtue vs sexuality debate is a pretty big one, and I literally just got done explaining why I'm siding with Mormons and feminists!

Was it the "looking sexy may not be a bad thing" part, Mr Burns? I say that because, as a student of Camille Paglia and a godless heathen liberal myself, I have no real interest in slut-shaming or denigrating sexuality. But my main point, is that it's important to keep a sense of perspective here: contrary to partisan folk wisdom, this is not an either/or proposition, where "either" you're obsessed with tits and butt, "or" you're some sex-hating, flannel-wearing, Mormon weirdo. And I think that is why people (like Gmork, for example) have such a problem with this video - we see "Mormon", and our tribal conditioning kicks in; putting us on the intellectual defensive and blinding us to the obvious truths these weirdos are stating.

We can accept sexuality, while still admitting that virtue is clearly better than the spectacle.

Virtue is completely independent of an outgoing personality. Ask any sociopath or the people they fuck.

They aren't arguing for integrity and brains. They're arguing for simply being celibate.

Titties and butts > an ugly virgin. Brains and integrity also aren't mutually exclusive to titties and butts, so your argument holds zero water. It's not a dichotomy.