| poeTV | Submit | Login   |

Reddit Digg Stumble Facebook

Help keep poeTV running


And please consider not blocking ads here. They help pay for the server. Pennies at a time. Literally.

Comment count is 37
Anaxagoras - 2017-06-21

Yeah, I loved Ebert, but he was batshit a lot of the time.

See also: Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas


Old_Zircon - 2017-06-21

I'd go so far as to say he was completely off base more often than not, at least on TV, but that was part of his charm.


dairyqueenlatifah - 2017-06-21

Eh, I remember most people liking/loving The Phantom Menace when it came out. It wasn't until many years later that recognizing it as irredeemable shit became popular.


exy - 2017-06-21

You either have an issue with your memory or with your attention.


Monkey Napoleon - 2017-06-22

No, he's right.

Even now it's still not all that uncommon to find people who unironically defend the prequels.

"The prequels are bad" is, in the larger picture, an internet meme... even if we agree that it's true. Entertainment criticism is something Joe Blow doesn't give a fuck about and, by extension, doesn't give a fuck about any of the metrics by which people judge art. Even a lot of people who pay attention to these things and hold the opinion that "X is bad because [reasons]" only think that because they heard someone say it and agreed after the fact.

All forms of entertainment have been going through increased scrutiny because the internet is a new-ish platform where anybody can broadcast their ideas to an audience that normally would have zero exposure to that level of criticism. A movie for most people is still just a thing they watch so they can forget about their shitty lives for a couple hours. Learning how the sausage is made and what differentiates a good sausage from a bad one is antithetical to why they do it in the first place.

They don't think of it as art.


Mr. Purple Cat Esq. - 2017-06-22

@Monkey Napoleon. When we're talking about these big blockbuster films, they're less films and more roller-coasters. But anyone can still tell a shitty boring technically deficient roller coaster from an exciting well crafted one.

When I saw the phantom menace I was fairly young, was not interested in film, had none of the tools or inclination to critique a film. I just dutifully / gormlessly went to see the big blockbusters in the cinema like a good consumer. When I went to see phantom menace I just remember watching it and feeling kinda bad / bored.
Compare that to the Matrix for example, I consciously had an issue with using people for power (doesnt fucking make sense! thermodynamics!!!) but I felt excitied, enthused, omg that is soo fuckin' coool!! I was completely caught up and engrossed in it while it was playing and even after leaving the cinema I was still buzzing and discussing it with my fam who I went to see it with.
It was only years later, after getting into film (went out with a girl who was mad into films and I caught the bug) and watching the Plinkett reviews that I realised *why* I had felt bad when watching them, they are just completely deficient in many of the basic elements of cinema.


Monkey Napoleon - 2017-06-22

Yeah, I get that. I never really liked the sequels either.

I also never really got what the big deal about the original movies was.

But for some people explosions, starfighting/podracing, lightsaber fights, and a familiar setting are enough... and it's a lot of people.

The third one prequel still made a bajillion dollars in theaters. Think about that for a second. People sat through the 2nd (handily the weakest of the 3) and still paid money for the third.


exy - 2017-06-22

Nope, I remember nobody over the age of 10 liking these.


garcet71283 - 2017-06-22

I liked Phantom Menace when it came out.

I was 13.

At 31, not too big of a fan.


infinite zest - 2017-06-22

Yeah I was born just after the whole original trilogy wrapped up, and by the time I had my own likes and dislikes, Star Wars was pretty much "over." Like, TIE Fighter was totally my favorite video game, but I never bothered with the movies because the VHSes (for rental purposes anyway) were worn to un-watchable and the scifi genre was getting darker with Aliens and Predator anyway. But I was excited about the possibility of a new one with actual CGI effects, and was equally excited to see the theatrical re-releases a few years before Phantom Menace. THIS was the Star Wars that everyone wished they had in the 70s, haha.. It really wasn't until 2003 or so when I got some Star Wars megatorrent with all the Laserdisc rips that I understood why haters were gonna hate.


Maggot Brain - 2017-06-22

@MN

Episode 2 was great! How can you forget such great lines like "I don't like sand" or "I wish I could just wish away my feelings."


SolRo - 2017-06-22

Darth Emo aside, episode 2 was enjoyable.


Raggamuffin - 2017-06-22

It's this weird thing these days; where the visual effects of modern movies are so good, and the structures and plots have been identified with repeatable formulas; you end up with films that FEEL like good movies when you first see them, and then later on you think about them a little and realize they were kinda shitty.

I know so many people who liked, for example, Jurassic World or Dark Knight Rises when they first came out. Now those movies seem to be losing their audiences as people start to realize they weren't as good as they'd thought. It's like the long term "cult movie finds a following" thing but in reverse.


Sexy Duck Cop - 2017-06-22

No one liked Phantom Menace. Ever. There was never a point in human history where a plurality of people collectively said "Yes, I know what the plot to that movie was."


infinite zest - 2017-06-23

Hmm I get Jurassic World but I disagree with 'Rises.' It's not as good as the second one but all 3 of those films are unbelievably solid, and probably the best trilogy as a whole I can think of, except for the "Before Sunrise" trilogy or "Infernal Affairs" trilogy, but the latter was condensed down to one neat and tidy (and better) single Scorcese film and the former is really just a more fictional version of Linklater's own 'Boyhood', having been filmed over the course of 20+ years. I don't even like Batman or superhero movies in general but I think maybe a better example is the continuation of the Die Hard Trilogy (six-ology now?)


badideasinaction - 2017-06-21

I remember a lot of reviews were trying really hard to polish that turd. Years of anticipation meant that just putting the words STAR WARS on screen did it for a lot of critics on first watch. Or the fallback of "oh, it's meant to be a kids movie, so ignore anything weak, the next movie will grow up and be awesome!".


Maggot Brain - 2017-06-21

In the guise of camp it almost works and you have to remember that this is the guy who co-wrote beyond the valley of the dolls.


Two Jar Slave - 2017-06-22

I seem to remember his written review saying it looked great and was very imaginative, which is all he wanted from Star Wars, but that the writing suffered.

It's honestly hard to remember back to a time when filmmakers couldn't put anything onscreen with fairly convincing animation, so something like Phantom Menace was at least a novelty to sit through. Actors interacting with a computer character, wow! A big robot battle, wow! We're so far past being able to enjoy Phantom's unique pleasures that I watched Doctor Strange the other evening and was bored stiff while Cumberbatch folded cities around themselves and reversed time. The Phantom Menace just had no staying power whatsoever.


garcet71283 - 2017-06-22

See also: Avatar


Two Jar Slave - 2017-06-22

There it is.


urbanelf - 2017-06-22

Zsa Zsa Binks


Lurchi - 2017-06-22

55% at Rotten Tomatoes -- Clones goes up to 65%. I took the day off from work and went to a matinee of Phantom Menace and I'll never forget the sinking feeling I felt throughout.

Lots of terrible things get off easily from critics who should know better. Hell The Matrix Reloaded got 73%, and when's the last time anyone rewatched that, or even thought of it.


Two Jar Slave - 2017-06-22

I thought about The Matrix Reloaded last night while watching John Wick 2, a karate vengeance movie with 119 onscreen deaths, almost exactly 3x what Reloaded had to offer.


Maggot Brain - 2017-06-22

Computer Jesus and the Search for the Missing Plot.


Lurchi - 2017-06-22

Mike Nelson cites The Phantom Menace as the worst movie ever made when people ask, and there's a case to be made for that.


Lurchi - 2017-06-22

the prequel Rifftrax (Rifftraxes?) are good, and probably the only way I could ever watch these again


Two Jar Slave - 2017-06-22

I LIKE THE WATER


Mr. Purple Cat Esq. - 2017-06-22

I think we should thank our lucky stars we have RLM to review our hollywood shlock.
Genuinely!
They're just some regular guys who are into their nerdy comic book / star wars films. They know a bit about film-craft and they give their honest, unfiltered, appraisal and feelings, unswayed by corporate interest or any social hubbub surrounding it.


Spit Spingola - 2017-06-22

People really wanted to like it when it came out. I saw it when it came out (a few days after opening night) and everyone applauded the damn thing. People had been waiting 16 years for another Star Wars movie. Ebert slammed Episode 2 at least.

Also, for what it's worth, the production design in Episode 1 is really good and the best of the 3 prequels.


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2017-06-22

I wonder if, 20 years from now, when some kid who hasn't been born yet sees the Star War Movies, and begins with episode 1, this is going to make a lot more sense. But to me, who started with episode 4 in the seventies, it's an origin story. George Lucas took the most boring, predictable 40 minutes of every comic book movie (Jor-El arguing with the Krptonian elders, Bruce Wayne's parents getting shot ONE MORE TIME, Peter's poor Uncle Ben, also dying one more time.), and expanded it over three feature films. I think Lucas must have been high as hell when he had the original idea, c. 1975.

HOWEVER, special effects at this level aren't merely technical. Some of these scenes resemble some of the great sci-fi cover art of the 50s and 60s come to life The automated battle scene, droid soldiers being unloaded on a big revolving coat rack is a fascinating concept, and fun to watch The Phantom Menace" doesn't deserve to be ranked with parts 4-6, but giving it a "thumbs up" is hardly an act of madness.

But it's "Jar-Jar Binks", Roger, not "Zsa-Zsa"! That was someone else.


Maggot Brain - 2017-06-23

They need to re-make batman but where The Wayne's just keep getting shot- They're not dead, but they can't walk either.


OxygenThief - 2017-06-22

HOT TAKE: Your enjoyment of a movie is less dependent on the quality of the movie and more on the quality of the nap and/or dinner you had before seeing the movie.


Old_Zircon - 2017-06-22

True.


betamaxed - 2017-06-22

As I get older the star wars prequels get better and better. Then again I'm a unique case as I watch Sompote Sands movies from Thailand without subtitles for fun.


garcet71283 - 2017-06-23

They aren't getting better, movies are just getting worse.


Stopheles - 2017-06-24

I traveled to NYC from CT and waited in line overnight to see THE PHANTOM MENACE in Union Square - along with me were friends of mine from college and their new roommate, my recent ex-girlfriend (who'd moved in with them after leaving me on a week's notice).

Neither of us was thrilled to see each other, but as soon as the movie ended, she asked me to walk across town with her and find another theater "so we can say we saw a movie without being embarrassed if anyone asks what the movie was."

We chose ELECTION. It was much, much better.

Then we got back together and the relationship was just as destructive and cold as it had been before.

Fuck you, George Lucas.


Two Jar Slave - 2017-06-25

How much notice do girlfriends normally give before leaving you? Is it like quitting a job?


Register or login To Post a Comment







Video content copyright the respective clip/station owners please see hosting site for more information.
Privacy Statement