It's the sexy nun effect.

We want what we can't have. When everything is accessible, the esoteric becomes more attractive. I believe that this is the primary cause of the rise of niche fetishes online.

That and she has a great rack any way you slice it.

The irony here is that 10 seconds on Google tells me she's a professional porn performer.

I suppose one could categorize mild titillation as a subgenre of porn then.

I dont like it when it creeps into films, computer games etc.
I like to keep my different shits separate!
Though thats just me, eg. I hate opera, music + drama.

There's no one answer. There are a lot of factors. Mild titillation can reach a wider audience on you tube. It's easy to find porn, but you have to look for it. A YouTube video can find you. Also, the more intensely erotic something is, the more personal it is, and the more it's going to turn other people off. Nothing is more unerotic than someone else's eroticism.

WARNING: I'M GOING TO TALK ABOUT MY FAVORITE PORN! Some of you may know that I'm bisexual. However, I only like straight porn. Sometimes, when I watch straight porn, it's for the cocks. One of my favorite pornsites is called "Gloryhole Swallow", which is probably self explanatory, and I enjoy watching black men fuck white women and cum inside them. (Is this racist? Discuss. Okay, PLEASE don't!) If a hundred people read this, Maybe fifty willl be sort of disgusted, or at least turned off. Maybe 47 will be indifferent, and 2 will go and search for some of this stuff. Perhaps 1 will say to himself, "JHM is right, GLORYHOLE SWALLOW RULES!"

But we can all enjoy the Jump rope sports bra test. At least enough to click on the link, which is all that is required. Mild titillation, like.other forms of.mediocrity, flourishes on youtube, where no one has to really has to care very much about content to be.successful. Its about getting the largest amount of.people.to care just a.little bit, enough to make the most minimal effort.

A porn star making mild cocktease youtube videos is genius.

She gets the ad revenue from youtube plus she possibly gains more buyers of her pro work.

cross platform synergy to the MAX!

That's like saying there's no need for background music in movies when Pandora exists.

Great rack confirmed after finding and viewing "PIPER BLUSH ABSOLUTELY AMAZING, TITTY FUCK"

@Nominal I dont like non-diegetic music in film. Its so weird and immersion breaking conceptually, like where the fuck is that music coming from? Imo its mainly used as a crutch when the filmmaker cant achieve the desired effect with purely cinematic techniques.

She has a cute personality and voice but other than that she does nothing for my physically. Not her fault, I'm just not attracted to skinny. At all. There's this girl at work who I'm absolutely sure thinks I'm staring at her ass because of where she stands and where I stand, but if she knew the girls I was ACTUALLY looking at... heh...

Gots to have that booty and belly. Tits are just frosting on a cake. I could go for an A-cup chick if the rest of her is right.

Jesus christ JHM, no one needs to know this. Staaahp.

Well, that's my point. The deeper you go into someone's private eroticism, the more people will be grossed out. Which is while mild jiggle is still a thing.

Masterful tugging dear sir.



FTFY

woof!

I couldn't handle her voice. Is she deaf?

Also horrible rope form.

She's French Canadian with a heavy accent.

It hadn't.occurred to me that they were fake, but I hadn't known she was a pro. I'm. gonna.take.a closer.look, and make up my own mind.

God speed!

This matter requires a rigorous 10 minute investigation.

Had a second look. Can't be real. Real tits that big splash all over the place, and wobble left/right around as well as up and down.

I think he's awesome.

Seconded.

Would probably work, I mean is there really anyone actively moderating the content on the site?

Even if poetv goes there, it still needs to be either especially 'poetv' or at least notable in some way.

I'll re-iterate my complaints.

Seriously? I like Chloe Morgane and and Camille Crimson because they're both redheads, ( and also, I believe, the same person) but I found a couple of Piper's porn vids and they're terrible, largely because of her faceless limp-dicked costar. This is the same guy? it's no fun watching her try to work up some enthusiasm sucking on this guy's semi, until he jerks off over her face. Maybe he's just not into her.

She says that her breasts have been augmented but with "no implants". I'm not up on what this actually means, this, but having seen them naked, I think she gets points for being tasteful, proportional, and reasonably human-looking. As long as there isn't a sack of lifeless saline in there, by my lexicon, her breasts are "real"... even if they've been somehow reshaped. It's the idea that they're not living things that makes fake tits such a turn off. But ideally, I think breasts should not be perfect, they should be a little bit eccentric. A little sagging or hanging or freckles or asymmetry can be poignant and lovely.

She really is gorgeous. In this video, she's badly lit or something, because in other places, she just looks stunning. It's her eyes.

Yes, Chloe and Camille are the same person, and the production quality on Piper's stuff is sub-par. Re: the implant thing - there could be some injection-type augmentation available, which would explain both the very high profile look, and lack of scarring around nipples (there would be scarring in the armpits, I think). Anyway, she is cute as fuck and has a nice attitude. That and the heavy duty sub collar is scorching hot.