SolRo - 2007-12-09
ehh, anyone care to explain how it's possible to push a ton+ of car for 100 miles on 4 ounces of water? Because I smell bullshit.
|
TinManic - 2007-12-09
+1 for "running water."
|
Ursa_minor - 2007-12-09
This is cool, but what isn't mentioned is that electrolysis takes a lot of energy - and unless it is somehow putting out more energy than is going in (which it is not) - it's just another fuel. This isn't anything new, as it is basically what the liquid rocket boosters on the space shuttle use as well.
|
Phusis - 2007-12-09
Google turns up http://anti-rant.blogspot.com/2006/05/simple-truth-about-hho-and-w ater.html. Conservation of energy, folks. Truth be told, though, it's difficult to tell if this is really a scam or if Fox is just misreporting what this guy's up to.
|
glasseye - 2007-12-09 One star. This guy is a kook who's presenting a simple electrolysis process as a magic wonder fuel. His insane completely unproven "theory" of "magnecules" seal the deal for me.
|
glasseye - 2007-12-09 And that was meant as a top-level comment, not a reply. Glargh.
|
phalsebob - 2007-12-09
Five stars or one?? Hmm.... five for Fox being so retarded. Either he is breaking the laws of nature, or it's just utterly uninspiring hydrogen fuel.
|
baleen - 2007-12-09
Walkin around on my feet and trains.
|
Register or login To Post a Comment |