Bush should be so lucky if this film is the extent to which history judges him.

Truth is a third of his voters will consider this portrayal of him as a partying cowboy, complementary.

Heh...Americans have about a 4 year memory...

Otherwise we would've been pointing fingers at every president before Bush that screwed up and put us in the place we are today.

I'd write a scathing letter to that bastard Polk but I don't think it'd do much good at this point.

> Truth is a third of his voters will consider this portrayal of him
> as a partying cowboy, complementary.

It and Bush add up to 90 degrees?

Doesn't matter, the fact that it's a big budget Oliver Stone biopic will take away any sting it might have, and crowd out anything else for several years. Oh well, there will always be history.

This is gonna be so easily shrugged off. I mean, our generation sure looks up to "Nixon" and "JFK" for the real unflinching truth! Oh yeah, we ignore those flubs, and watch good documentaries instead.

Yes because the purpose of historical films is to stick completely to the honest truth. Never mind that fucking Lawrence of Arabia was 95 percent made up, of course.

By that I of course am not inferring that anyone does violence to our beloved leader, but that he unwittingly eats a tainted burrito and the bacteria unleashes a previously unknown strength and he dies of intense hemorraging from the massive diarrhea surge.

And then if this happened I would totally pay money to see this movie.

shut up