Clinton ally, fought the FEC in favor of dark money in politics

'misinformation' meaning 'facts that are uncomfortable for the liberal media' and 'political agenda' meaning 'he'd prefer that the person who has publicly and privately suggested killing him multiple times not become president of the united states'

"Misinformation" meaning "look it up, asshole".

Of course, when you a do a little digging, you find that the reason why these facts are "inconvenient for the liberal media" is because they're lies. When I googled "Hillary Clinton publicly and privately called for the killing of Assange", "here's the first thing that came up :

The Intercept, November 2017

https://tinyurl.com/yc7chabn

So yeah, according to the Mueller Report, Assange gave public statements implying that the source of the leaked Clinton docs had been Seth Rich, a cruel, damaging lie that has been debunked, and according to this article the source of the allegation that Clinton talked about having Assange killed with a drone strike is handful of tweets and blogposts, some having nothing to do with Clinton.

In 2017, it was revealed that Assange was working directly with the Trump campaign, privately communicating with Don Jr, via Twitter.

Here are some quotes from Barret Brown, a journalist who had gone to prison for his work with WikiLeaks, after he learned that Assange had been communicating with Don, Jr.

>>>Brown explained that he had defended WikiLeaks for releasing emails hacked from the Democratic National Committee, “because it was an appropriate thing for a transparency org to do.” But, he added, “working with an authoritarian would-be leader to deceive the public is indefensible and disgusting.”

>>>He was particularly outraged by an Oct. 21, 2016 message, in which Assange had appealed to Trump Jr. to let WikiLeaks publish one or more of his father’s tax returns in order to make his group’s attacks on Hillary Clinton seem less biased. “If we publish them it will dramatically improve the perception of our impartiality,” the Assange-controlled @Wikileaks account suggested. “That means that the vast amount of stuff that we are publishing on Clinton will have much higher impact, because it won’t be perceived as coming from a ‘pro-Trump’ ‘pro-Russia’ source, which the Clinton campaign is constantly slandering us with.”

>>>As Brown pointed out in another tweet, it was all-caps exasperating that Assange was in this case “complaining about ‘slander’ of being pro-Trump IN THE ACTUAL COURSE OF COLLABORATING WITH TRUMP.”

What's this? It's just Crackersmack, once being exposed as a fool, almost beyond the limits of human folly, and lucky for us, it's not going to give him a moment's thought. He'll be back, proudly shitting all over himself, and all over reality, probably right below this comment.

I need to stop being so mean. It's a bad look, even if it doesn't bother Cracker.

Both of them may have started out as good people but time turned them into stupid assholes

It's not clear which two people you mean, but practically no one deserves to be mentioned in the same breath as Julian Assange for being a duplicitous piece of shit.. not Hilary, not me, not Crackersmack, arguably not even Trump.

Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning turned state secrets over to journalists who sought to release information responsibly, but Assange just dumped everything, because the truth, transparency, sha na na, but it was all smoke and mirrors, just cover for cruel, destructive lies, and now teenage girls have to worry about carrying their rape babies to term, because Julian Assange took aim at American power.