Syd Midnight - 2007-11-23
Now I can understand the people who said a mk-48 could probably own a battleship.
|
FABIO2 - 2007-11-23
Is it a frigate, destroyer, or battleship? Make up your mind.
|
|
|
Syd Midnight - 2013-06-19 It was a P_N thing. I ignorantly said that battleships weren't obsolete because they could take a few torpedo/missile hits, but an actual submariner assured me that a Mk48 is no WW2 torpedo, and is more than capable of doing the job.
|
Camonk - 2007-11-23
The most advanced submarine in the Royal Australian Navy... So the only one? Hah hah! Or the only one without a screen door? BAM!
I'm sorry, Australia. You actually seem like a lovely country and I'm sure your military is quite puissant.
|
Wonko the Sane - 2007-11-23
DAMN!
If you look you can see her back get broke before the water even gets disturbed....
|
|
Caminante Nocturno - 2007-11-24
I don't want to see the military as an extension of my manhood, but they always make it so difficult not to.
|
Jimmy Labatt - 2007-11-24
Holy shit the torpedo made that ship look like one of those snap-together models
|
FABIO2 - 2007-11-30
This is also why I don't believe it when people say aircraft carriers are still viable weapons in the missile age.
|
|
Namor - 2008-06-25
Awesome, thanks Syd. Just as I described over on poe-news, the explosion forces the midships up, then it falls down into the area where water has been briefly pushed aside. For a rigid ship of this size, such a "backbreaker" is completely fatal, and the size of the vessel is no defense against a direct hit.
|
j lzrd / swift idiot - 2008-06-27
Hell of a nice kaplooey. We'll have to think twice about getting into a war with Australia...
|
Register or login To Post a Comment |