My favorite part is just how important a man's innocence or guilt of a misdemeanor offense is in determining whether or not he should be shot dead in the fucking street like a wild raccoon. Even stray dogs get netted and processed by animal control before they're put down, at worst.

I really don't think there is any money being exchanged here. So the question is whether or not this is actually Michael Brown, but whoever this is in this video displays no money, reaches very deeply behind the counter, and then ends up with an entire box of blunts, display packaging at all. I find it very difficult to believe that this is an actual purchase. If so, why does the clerk come out from behind the counter and approach the guy (the guy that the man in the red hat later assaults -- something not included in the video).

All of this stuff seems so obvious that I can't tell whether the video is some sort of attempt at a trolljob or not.

also the most telling thing in this case to me is the cops at first had a press conference where they said that the officer who shot him did not know about the robbery when he first pulled him over. Then at a later press conference they said that he was pulled over for jaywalking. Why not include that in the first press conference? And the story changed to the officer did know about the robbery but only put it together that they could be suspects by the time he actually pulled them over. I'm confused as to why this is. It seems like they keep releasing contradictory information with every announcement.

If they did commit a robbery, Dorian's account will be in question. Other witnesses were too far away to see what happened in the car. Dorian says the officer tried to push him in the car, drew his gun and shot and then Michael ran, stopped, and surrendered before being shot. The officer says Michael tried to push the officer back in the car. Piaget Crenshaw says it looked like they were armwrestling in the car and that he was shot BEFORE he put his hands up and was then shot again.

I feel like both Dorian and the cop are lying but how much I don't know. Neither of them are reliable witnesses. THIS is why all cop cars need dashcams and officers should wear cameras on them at all times.

It alters the narrative pretty significantly and it's goofy to deny that.

Being a suspect in a strong-arm robbery certainly shouldn't result in an immediate death penalty (six bullets is no worse than one, in my opinion), but it changes the story quite a bit.

whether or not he paid for the cigars doesn't provide context for shooting him to death.


it does change the narrative of what happened afterwards though, you are right about that.

It also is going to be fuel for the police department. They are desperate to turn attention away from themselves and somehow justify this. The facts are that Brown was shot six times, which is pretty unjustifiable...but the main witness and his testimony can now be called into question because he had reason to alter it due to his part in the robbery.

If they think he (Dorian) has motive to lie, then it will make it easier to paint them as both aggressive, and with no proof either way no one's testimony is reliable. It's a shitty situation.

What a marvelous name! It sounds like exactly the last place I would ever want to go for news on this or any incident involving a black man, dead or otherwise!

It never fails to live up to it's name.

Did You Know? Chimpout and Stormfront hate each other! It's true! The world's premier forum for people who hate black people and the world's premier forum for White National Socialists do not get along. This is because the admins over at Chimpout do not want people bitching about Jews, and the admins over at Stormfront think Chimpout's singleminded focus on black people is counter-productive, stupid, and most likely part of some Zionist psyops scheme to deflect energy away from the anti-Israeli movement. It is much like the feud between PoE and SA, only with more hate speech!