| poeTV | Submit | Login   |

Reddit Digg Stumble Facebook

Help keep poeTV running


And please consider not blocking ads here. They help pay for the server. Pennies at a time. Literally.

Comment count is 21
SolRo - 2020-07-12

My delusional fantasy is that once trump is out of office that congress enacts laws to severely reign in presidential powers, such as presidential pardons and executive orders.


SolRo - 2020-07-12

(which I'm sure republicans will support once a democrat is president, but I'd like a constitutional amendment so that congress cannot easily reverse it when it will benefit the party in power)


Marlon Brawndo - 2020-07-13

Obama actually expanded presidential powers quite a bit.

Bet that has to smart!


Miss Henson's 6th grade class - 2020-07-13

True and unfortunate and part of a trend. But Obama's choice was to lean on executive power and or turn into another Jimmy Carter.


SolRo - 2020-07-13

I propose curtailing the power of the executive and also the power of speakers of each house of Congress. No Mitch mcconel of the future should have the power to block legislation from being voted on.

America’s political system is deeply flawed and based on the assumption that politicians won’t be assholes, but is currently infested with them


Nominal - 2020-07-13

Go vote up FDR's fireside chat in the hopper!

Near the end he makes a point to basically say, "To anyone afraid that a politician will want to appoint spineless justices to the supreme court, or justices would be spineless enough to blindly promote a president's agenda, then the entire political system would already be beyond fucked."


Marlon Brawndo - 2020-07-13

Oh no, he talked about his dead brother in regards to his addiction problems. Because he has no right to do that, what with the fact that it was his brother and all. Who fucking cares if that offends the judge? Writing something offensive isn't illegal. Dear heavens, he talked about the opioid crisis and tried to relate to people who have family members going through addiction. Oh my stars!

Besides which, being offended is what America is all about. If you make that illegal, I'm going to be the first one in jail! And none of you would want that!


Chicken the Did - 2020-07-13

Nah, Brawndo. I am a bit of a far lefty. I wouldn't take you to jail.
I wouldn't take you -anywhere-. ;D


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2020-07-13

Like the clueless jackass that he is, Brawndo is mistaking a discussion of Mary Trump's reasons for writing the book for a discussion of the book's content, and so his pedestrian sarcasm is pretty much beside the point.

These people clearly haven't fully digested the book's content yet, but those big giddy smiles are priceless.

If this book hurts Trump, it will be by undermining the fake image of the infallible business genius that Trump built up over 14 years of his horrible TV program. This what people don't get. All of these years of lies and pooch screwing are still only a third of Trumps 14 years of prime time.
One thing that is happening now is that Trump's opponents, particularly the Lincoln project, are pretty openly trolling him. They're buying ad time on the Fox News shows that they know he watches, deliberately pushing him to more deranged Twitter tantrums. This will hurt Trump with his base only if he can't resist hitting back. But at this point, it's starting to look like his base can't save him.


Hazelnut - 2020-07-13

MB, when you do that snide SolRo-style sarcasm it doesn't come off as witty, it comes off like you just read Trump's poll numbers and are super-defensive.


Meerkat - 2020-07-13

It won't hurt Trump. He has his 32% hardcore nomatterwhatters for whom his dickishness is the whole point.


Marlon Brawndo - 2020-07-13

JHM, did you watch the video? They went out of their way to make a big deal out of the fact that the judge thought that Trump's actions in regards to talking about his brother's addiction were offensive.

My question is: Why would that be offensive and why would you even mention that if this is about Mary Trump and her book? It just seemed to stand out as really odd and unnecessary to bring up.


Marlon Brawndo - 2020-07-13

Hazelnut, I don't think I'm being defensive of Trump. I am just raising an important question in regards to why it's necessary to smear him for bringing up his brother, who was an addict, who did die. Why would it be offensive for Trump to bring that up when trying to relate to people in regards to the opioid crisis?

I realize a lot of people don't like him. I even realize he comes across as an asshole a lot of the time. But he is a human being and I don't doubt he was at the very least saddened over his brother's death. I think Mary has a lot of grief over her father and I don't think that any of that is Trump's fault. He didn't talk to his brother for a long time because of those addiction issues. And that sucks. It's a horrible thing for any family to go through.

If you want to criticize Trump for things he's done, I think that's fair. I don't think it's fair to go into the imaginary fairy realm of "he obviously is trying to use his brother's death". Because it's not obvious. You don't know that. Nobody knows that and it's really arrogant to say that can be determined.


Marlon Brawndo - 2020-07-13

Chicken the Did - I was hoping someone would crack a joke back so thank you.


Hazelnut - 2020-07-13

Hi MB, I think if you're trying to raise an important question, then it's especially important to avoid the sarcasms like "Dear heavens", "Oh my stars!", "I'm going to be the first one in jail!". Pissy asides like that don't start conversations, they're used by the Crackersmacks and SolRos to kill off conversations they're afraid to continue.

Anyway, I watched the video and what I got out of it was valid observations about Trump's genuine sociopathy—caring nothing for anyone but himself. I'm not sure where you got the 'smear him for bringing up his brother' stuff, but if you point me to the point in the video you're referring to I'll gladly re-watch it.


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2020-07-13

>>>If you want to criticize Trump for things he's done, I think that's fair. I don't think it's fair to go into the imaginary fairy realm of "he obviously is trying to use his brother's death". Because it's not obvious. You don't know that. Nobody knows that and it's really arrogant to say that can be determined.

Jesus Christ, Brawndo.

The reporters were discussing the estrangement of Donald Trump from his niece, and how it fits into her morives for writing the book. They were alluding to an incident the.Mary Trump writes about.

Try to follow mw here. If Mary Trump feels this way, and Mary Trump has publicly said that she feels this way, saying that Mary Trump feels this way is not "the fairy tale realm". It isn't a direct criticism of Trump, and is completely appropriate in a discussion of how Mary Trump feels.


exy - 2020-07-13

> But he is a human being and I don't doubt he was at the very least saddened over his brother's death.

that is some lazy-ass trolling right there MB

> Because it's not obvious. You don't know that. Nobody knows that and it's really arrogant to say that can be determined.

or maybe you're just really dumb?

nah, i'm sticking with lazy trolling. you're welcome!


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2020-07-13

Yeah, it's really lazy trolling.


Hazelnut - 2020-07-14

Every once in a while I _think_ MB is making a genuine effort, because he sounds so genuinely hurt when people point out the trolling. All I know is if he _is_ trying to be genuine, he's gotta cut out the lazy.


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2020-07-13

Actually, are you ready for this? I believe I recently read a quote from a Trump where he discusses his brother's sickness, and uncharacteristically acknowleges regret, admits mistakes, and accepts some responsibility. I wish I could remember the quote, or better, where I saw it.

But its still not the point of any of this.


John Holmes Motherfucker - 2020-07-14

>>>>My question is: Why would that be offensive and why would you even mention that if this is about Mary Trump and her book? It just seemed to stand out as really odd and unnecessary to bring up.

I just bought the book, and I can tell you that just about every reference in this video to the content of the book refers to the first chapter. In other words, CNN just got the book, have only had the chance to read a little bit, and are rushing to get to the air with their first impressions.

In chapter 1, she writes:

>>>>When Donald started addressing the opioid crisis and using my father’s history with alcoholism to burnish his anti-addiction bona fides to seem more sympathetic, both of us were angry.

>>>>“He’s using your father’s memory for political purposes,” Maryanne said, “and that’s a sin, especially since Freddy should have been the star of the family.”

I'll tell you honestly, I'm not sure that they're not misjudging him. Trump can usually seem like a dick, because he's usually a dick. But what if he's not being a dick this one time? Using his own family experience to relate to opioid addicts seems like it could be a sincere stab at empathy. I've seen evidence that Trump has unusually deep feelings about his brother's death. I'm not close enough to judge his motives... but is it possible that shes TOO close to judge? To her credit, she's not portraying herself as outside the family dysfunction.

But to answer your question, Brawndo, the CNN reporters are mentioning that because it's the one time early in the book when Mary Trump said that her uncle made her angry. They're not saying THEY were offended. SHE was offended, and she very explicitly says so.


Register or login To Post a Comment







Video content copyright the respective clip/station owners please see hosting site for more information.
Privacy Statement