This takes me back to when I was outright banned from my local paper's website because the commentators thought the Democrats were to blame for the bills original defeat (http://www.poetv.com/video.php?vid=82186).
Long story short, I couldn't stand those posters and their ill-informed opinions and told the entire community to go fuck themselves (and also that their souls were black and they probably smelled bad).
The sad thing is, you could hate them perhaps a little less if there was some sort of fat attached to the bill. Like puppy kicking or kitten juggling. Alas, there is not one rider on the bill. Nothing but care and assistance for people who performed an impossible task, which the D.C. elite invoke for their own gains ceaselessly.
I would really like to see someone try to respond to this and make it look like the Republicans' decision was justified or true to their moral code in any way possible. For the past decade, they have used 9/11 as a way to pity fuck their way into office, blatantly exploit the event to help pass legislation and used it as their launching point for nearly everything. I would really like to see someone attempt to justify their choice.