I still don't understand why the plaintiff -- regarding the question of "breaking" versus "being broken" -- didn't just point to the defendant and say, "That's all the evidence I need right there."
I like the idea of Speed Court (swift justice) as Quad mentioned, but having seen this in the slow mode...it just doesn't live up to that level of entertainment
where do you even get this from. it's like saying a movie prequel is a "logic flaw" because it opposes the original timeline, or that an inverted curve enhancement in photoshop is a "logic flaw" because it's the other way around, or that you are a fucking retarded assbag