I mean, evidence is evidence. The only issue I know of in trials is withholding evidence from one side during discovery or trying to add new evidence during a trial already under way

I don’t know any issues with evidence being widely known

No evidence was presented. No grand jury was convened. No trial took place. They let him go because he's autistic and they figured that means he won't do it again.

I think it was because they didn't have the evidence to get her on rape and she had already served a standard incest sentence in jail.

The charge was upgraded from misdemeanor incest to felony incest, then deferred, then later dismissed.

§ 19.2-303.6
In any criminal case, ...after a plea of not guilty, and the facts found by the court would justify a finding of guilt, the court may, if the defendant has been diagnosed by a psychiatrist or clinical psychologist with ... an autism spectrum disorder ... and the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the criminal conduct was caused by or had a direct and substantial relationship to the person's disorder ..., without entering a judgment of guilt and with the consent of the accused, after giving due consideration to the position of the attorney for the Commonwealth and the views of the victim, defer further proceedings and place the accused on probation subject to terms and conditions set by the court. Upon violation of a term or condition, the court may enter an adjudication of guilt; or upon fulfillment of the terms and conditions, the court may discharge the person and dismiss the proceedings against him without an adjudication of guilt.

If I may hazard a guess, without knowing anything, it may be that any evidence that the internet had before the authorities had technically CAME FROM THE INTERNET.

Actually, how did the kiwifarmers get it? If they got it illegally, that makes it inadmissable. (I guess? Not a lawyer.)

Wish we had a lawyer on here to explain if evidence obtained through illegal means by a civilian is inadmissible in the same way if cops obtain evidence illegally

I get the feeling it’s still admissible because the rules for evidence are to protect against constitutional rights abuses by the state, not from citizens. The brief research I did seems to support this.

A few 'Mother Fucker!'s will also be throw in there.

He's back at the house

https://archive.is/pen0h

uh according to the people in the comments Barb is also in that house

*correction: SHE gets to go home and fuck HER mom lol

Hi Crackersmack. I'm reintroducing myself to the poe community after quite a few years absence. I see that you are somewhat of a lightning rod around here these days. Look forward to getting into it with ya!

Im sure there's some sort of separation order

pretty sure everybody loves me and I am like the MVP poster here

Chris Chan discussed it on a telephone call with a troll and makes it out to be some sort of a healing ritual. Christine thinks she's a goddess. This is the worst saga.

Worst saga SO FAR.

He also said in one of his jail letters that Barb needs to die soon so he can inherit the house...