And didn't fall asleep at the podium.

This is basically what Biden said in regards to cancelling medical debt paid with credit.

I'm not voting for that motherfucker again.

Doesn't matter. You have to be at least 18 vote anyway.

You ARE a child, right?

except personal medical debt and, ya know, how NATO is funded are completely different things and there's a guy who has started a war in europe who has made it pretty clear they have eyes on territory further west

but y'all wanna pretend like you're living in some dystopian hellscape despite living in the wealthiest/most prosperous time in human history and your lives are part of some grand sweeping hollywood arc against some evil empire, i get it, have fun kids, make sure to put on a sweater and be home in time for dinner

teeth: I know personally around like 12 senior citizens living in their cars because whatever fixed income they have can't pay for rent, and housing assistance has a several year waiting list. I also know a lot of homeless fent addicts whose main source of health care is post-arrest ER screenings to make sure they're healthy enough to go to jail. It's often pretty severe stuff.

America is the most wealthy country in world history. But there are a lot of people sleeping in the rain in the woods behind the NAPA Auto Parts with festering injection wounds. Pretending like money spent to bomb strangers on the other side of the world wouldn't be better spent to help those people is not the mark of maturity that you think it is.

"your lives are part of some grand sweeping hollywood arc against some evil empire"

Okay.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_a3hhYeovI

"there's a guy who has started a war in europe who has made it pretty clear they have eyes on territory further west"

this lib obsession with russia is so incredibly fucking retarded, I cannot believe we are about to do it for another four years when genocide joe loses, who would have guessed that Mother losing in 2016 because of pure hubris would break the lib's brains so completely that here a decade later we are still making up nonsense about putin

Putin is evil on the level of a James Bond villain. He is killing people who oppose him, not even quietly at that.

The U.S. is also having a major economic crisis and shit is cartoonishly expensive right now. But not everyone was enjoying upper-middle class levels of the American Dream even before the virus rolled through.

Money is tight and retirees are living in cars and Putin is evil and the orange guy really, really shouldn't have said the thing about the imaginary invoice because it's very obvious he's in tight with Pootie.

Putin is whatever he is, but one thing that everybody should be able to agree on is that Putin is not the cause of any of the many serious domestic problems in the US that are currently going unaddressed (or in the case of housing totally unacknowledged) by either of the major party candidates. Putin didn't do all this. Killing Putin wouldn't fix any of this. Putin is a distraction.

HURP DURP HERE'S A BAD THING BIDEN DID THEREFORE I'M GOING TO FUNCTIONALLY SUPPORT SOMEONE DEMONSTRABLY WORSE WHILE USING THE NADER DEFENSE

yeah we deserve what we get with retards like this being able to vote

Oh friendly reminder Russia is actively targeting torturing and murdering gay people and it's government sponsored and approved

I hate to be the one to break it to you, but American foreign policy has never been based on the moral character of foreign states.

Like, we supported the Khmer Rouge as the official government of Cambodia up until 1993, and probably directly armed them to weaken the USSR and Vietnam. There are so many other examples it is difficult to pick. We've routinely overthrown democratically elected governments and installed dictators. There's a whole wikipedia article about it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._policy_toward_authoritarian _governments

Don't get me wrong, I am all in favor of aligning our foreign policy to consistently promote human rights. I just think that this is a more radical proposal than might be generally understood.

Binro likes using children's story examples, so here's a relevant one for him:

Remember the dwarves in The Last Battle, the final Narnia book? They were annoyed by some of Narnia's human king's policies. Then the neighboring evil kingdom invades. The dwarves announce they're not going to support anyone and sit on their ass, even when the invading kingdom starts marching every Narnian into execution barns to be sacrificed to their blood god.

When faced with this obviously existential evil, the dwarves are not only still too stupid to try and stop the invaders, they sabotage the one chance that the Narnians had to defeat them. Declaring, "The dwarves are for the dwarves!" they didn't want either side getting an advantage because they thought a magical perfect system would rise up from the ashes of letting everything burn down. But oops, when the invaders got the advantage, it was too late to stop them either and everyone was pushed into the execution barn.

Not getting up to vote the only first past the post option to defeat Trump is the dwarves sitting out. Hoping the Democratic party learns a lesson and goes down in flames is the dwarves shooting all the horses. Remember how angry it made you when the dwarves shot all the horses?

Don't be the dwarves.

yeas because of dwarves and elves and shit you should vote for the political party that is currently practically unanimous in it's policy of starving a population of millions as a form of collective punishment and ethnic cleansing.

that's what you should vote FOR.

starvation of children. because of elves and shit

Genuine question for you guys. Is there a line that a Democrat could cross where you would be unwilling to vote for them, so long as the Republican was a little worse? If not genocide, what?

we're the exhibits now

well, I'll vote for that.

That fact that righteous outrage is engagement-bait drives a lot of our media and politics.

what's boxxy up to these days?