rural - 2009-03-25
How many orders of magnitude greater than the recent cinematic attempt?
Many.
|
chairsforcheap - 2009-03-25
chills! stars!
|
zatojones - 2009-03-25
I bet Rorschach is fun at parties
|
StanleyPain - 2009-03-25 The party goers will look up and shout "give us more beer and pretzels", and i'll look down and whisper...."no"
|
|
The Great Hippo - 2009-03-25
My favorite speech from the whole goddamn thing. I was so *pissed* when I found out they cut the majority of it out of the movie.
Oh well.
|
|
Whitewater5 - 2009-03-25
Only four stars because they cut the speech in half wtf
|
Boxhead - 2009-03-25
A little over-wrought. But he's a dramatic fellow.
What this emphasizes to me was how overdone I felt the movie Rorschach's voice was. It's gravelly. It's not a a fucking consta-growl.
|
Rape Van Winkle - 2009-03-25 I kept wondering if it was based on Bale's Dark Knight voice, or if it was a coincidence.
There were still some flecks of gold. "I'M NOT LOCKED IN HERE WITH YOU . . . YOU'RE LOCKED IN HERE WITH ME!" for example.
|
StanleyPain - 2009-03-25
I think someone is mistaken, this isn't Alan Moore doing Rorschach, it's just how Moore usually is.
|
fatatty - 2009-03-25 This is just what rolls through Moore's mind as he stares off his porch sipping tea.
|
|
Wonko the Sane - 2009-03-25
This is otherwise good text that cannot be read aloud in a non laughable manner.
|
Jefka - 2009-03-25 The type of laughable makes a difference, though. Picture, say, Duckman reading this.
|
ztc - 2009-03-25
That voice makes me think we need a kitchen-sink adaptation of Watchmen set in 80's Birmingham and written by Alan Bleasdale.
|
Keefu - 2009-03-25
I'd always imagined Rorschach as having a nasally aspie voice.
|
|
allcaps - 2009-03-25
Jesus.
I'd been reconsidering my view of the movie's take on Rorschach, which had been wholly positive. Then I started to see that they'd removed a lot of his intensity. In the book, he needs it to explain how a shrimpy, rather ordinary shut-in could be seen as scary and threatening. The movie was like, fuck that shit, let's give him some kung fu.
Now I appreciate that choice much more. They could have played him as an insufferably prattling blowhard with an inflated sense of his own drama. Like they have here.
|
kingofthenothing - 2009-03-25
I always wondered in the end, what they ended up doing with his journal. I guess it will always be open to interpretation. My take was that it got passed around but never taken seriously, except by the conspiracy theory crowd. It would be quite ironic for those people to say "aliens didn't do it!", and maybe in the alternate universe of the Watchmen, people on fark had photoshop contests of his journal with the caption "I want to believe".
|
StanleyPain - 2009-03-25 My interpretation of the ending was always that the message gets out. It starts out as conspiracy lunacy, but eventually gets enough weight (like the JFK assassination theories) that more and more people catch on and eventually the plot is exposed years down the line, thus fulfilling Manhattan's cryptic "things never end" comment and ultimately proving Veidt's scheme wrong because, in the end, the truth eventually comes out and when a hero tries to bend it and manipulate it, somewhere in the end, he will fail and become the villain.
That was always the future I imagined for the book.
|
FISTFULLofSOUL - 2009-03-25
Wow.
|
Register or login To Post a Comment |